14th March 2005, 9:05 PM
Quote:And that fact forces GB games to be noticably different from their major-console siblings. That should be pretty obvious.
I see, so the fact that we had to pay $30 for ports of really old console games made everything so much better.
I love your logic, I really do.
Quote:OB1, this is NINTENDO we're talking about. They don't release all that many games and, in recent years, they seem to want to make it hard for third parties to release a lot of stuff on their systems. So of course PSP will have more games than DS. The final proportion, though, will be based on the sales of both consoles... if DS keeps doing as well as it is, it should see a more reasonable comparison rate. But given the companies involved, and hardware platforms, of course PSP will have more games... though it might not have more games that are actually original. That could easily go either way... (yes, DS will have some N64 ports, but PSP will surely have far more PS1 and PS2 ports...)
Ah yes, so it's okay that there are only two games worth buying on the DS since its launch five months ago... because it's Nintendo. Wow, what great logic again.
I'm sure consumers will totally agree with you there.