The stupid debate that ABF made even stupider thread

[OB1]

I responded to what he said even before you did so you can't say that you and him were the only relevant people...

Notice that he did not repond to you.

Think about that for a while.

Because you are too.

"No YOU are!!!11111111"

Sure. It's because, unlike with me, you didn't enter your discussion with him with the preconception that everything he was going to say would automatically be wrong and stupid and that you'd ignore it all and insult him instead. Pretty simple.

Believe it or not, that's not how I go into discussions with you. You're just always wrong and stupid. Really, every time I'm about to read one of your posts I'm saying to myself "PLEEEAAASE don't let me say something retarded again!".

I don't think you disagree with anything in the statement, OB1... you only say that because you have it in your mind that I am always wrong, not because of anything I actually said.

You're still not getting the point. What you said is a rebuttal to something you imagined that I said. Why on earth should I respond to that?

Allow me to demonstrate how conversations usually work with you:


Me: I think that french bread is the best kind of bread you can buy in a regular supermarket here in the states.

You: No, I think that fresh tomatoes are very important in a sandwich.

Me: ... What does that have to do with what I just said.

You: You just don't want to respond to that because you know that I'm right!

Me: .... you are an idiot, ABF.


You see, it's not that I disagree with your statement about tomatoes (I love tomatoes), but it only indirectly has anything to do with my statement! I wasn't talking about fucking tomatoes!