The stupid debate that ABF made even stupider thread

[OB1]

You do that all the time though... how you don't read what other people said closely enough and thus misstate and miscategorize what they mean... and is is wrong to think something when you so strongly defend visual and say virtually nothing good about written? Weltall assumed the same thing about what you were saying so I really don't think you can blame it all on me this time.

It's hard to get all the context of your conversation when a lot of it was obviously done on IM and not here on the forum you know... but anyway, it's true. It's not ignorant, but a reflection of how you argue, OB1... you take a position and strongly defend it! That's what you do! And here, since film was "under threat", you defend that at the expense of books. Pretty simple and wholly accurate. Sure, you say that you think they are equal. But your tone... I definitely got the impression that you are just saying that and that you don't really believe it. Why else would you talk almost solely about visual examples (and then throw in the requisite comment that they are equal)?

Alright look bucko, either you can grow up and try to carry on a mature discussion with me or you can be your usual self and act like an idiot. Choose one.