Haha, ABF gets a taste of his own medicine

[OB1]

Your arguements against my points usually aren't good enough for me to have a great rebuttal, because you don't usually adress the specific issues I talk about... or if you do it's in no detail...

This debate is already over, it's now just you making yourself look like an even greater fool.

And for the love of mike, it's spelled argument, a-r-g-u-m-e-n-t. No "e" after the "u"!!

At least you admit that that was your motivation.

What, to annoy you? I've already explained that. Like, five times already.

In some regards yes, the differences between the games are great. In others they are not.

You cannot make that assesment until you've played the game, stupid!!

Like any other series. On the level I am talking about the differences between the TES games change things like some details but do not change the basic theme they are trying to accoplish or what kind of game they were trying to make. That is simply a fact. I notice that despite your denials you don't actually try to refute any of my actual points... that's because, on the whole at least, I am right about what kind of game Bethesda was trying to make with Morrowind and right about how in most regards it was a result of refining and improving on what they had done in the past instead of making up totally new game styles. The result of that? You only need to play one to be able to compare the general style of gameplay to a Baldur's Gate, just like how I don't need to play both BGI and BGII to be able to talk about how BG does its general gameplay themes. Again, I'm not talking about the details here! You still don't understand that, clearly.

I understand that you're a moron. That much I'm certain of.

I would never criticize Baldur's Gate II if I've only played Baldur's Gate I. I would never criticize Mario World if I've only played Mario 3. Only a fool would do such a thing. Your are one such fool.