Haha, ABF gets a taste of his own medicine

[A Black Falcon]

Your rebuttals are great! They consist of either "Nope you're wrong", "Uh-uh, that's false", "Sorry, but that's simply not true", or my personal favorite, "Sorry you're wrong, then again you don't have glasses so you can't see your face!!!11".

Your arguements against my points usually aren't good enough for me to have a great rebuttal, because you don't usually adress the specific issues I talk about... or if you do it's in no detail...

I've already proven you wrong, and sticking out your tongue while saying "nanny nanny boo boo" isn't reversing your wrongness.

At least you admit that that was your motivation. :)

Since that thread I've played all of the previous Elder Scrolls games, and the differences are indeed great. You, however, are still a moron who knows nothing of this subject.

In some regards yes, the differences between the games are great. In others they are not. Like any other series. On the level I am talking about the differences between the TES games change things like some details but do not change the basic theme they are trying to accoplish or what kind of game they were trying to make. That is simply a fact. I notice that despite your denials you don't actually try to refute any of my actual points... that's because, on the whole at least, I am right about what kind of game Bethesda was trying to make with Morrowind and right about how in most regards it was a result of refining and improving on what they had done in the past instead of making up totally new game styles. The result of that? You only need to play one to be able to compare the general style of gameplay to a Baldur's Gate, just like how I don't need to play both BGI and BGII to be able to talk about how BG does its general gameplay themes. Again, I'm not talking about the details here! You still don't understand that, clearly.