Haha, ABF gets a taste of his own medicine

[OB1]

He was saying that the two arguements are the same... Arena/Daggerfall:Morrowind::CivI/II:CivIII. I said that the analogy is flawed. Then I went on to imply another thing: GR, if you've only played Civ I you can only compare it to SimCity. Not 2000 or 3000 or 4, only the first one. You could only compare the later ones if you'd played the later Civ games. And even then it's problematic because your knowledge of how great the later games are might influence your opinion on the first SimCity (which was pretty good, certainly, but had definite issues (Civ I did too, of course, compared to the later games in that series)).

They're not the same, but they're about as bad as each other. You constantly try to criticize games without having played them (morrowind, mgs3). Playing previous games in the series most certainly does not make it any better! Especially when there's such a huge difference between them. You're a much bigger fool than GR is.

Civilization is one of the most beloved series on the PC and your insulting it with absolutely no basis is probably a new low for you even considering how low you have sank on previous occasions. Idiotic, so utterly wrong that I probably should not reply, and more proof that you care more about insulting me than you do about using your brain or considering what you are saying.

I wasn't calling Civ crappy, genius. I was referring to all of those crappy N64 games you like.