8th October 2004, 6:04 PM
I don't know how to snap a shot via DVD on the computer, or else I would.
Don't be ridiculous; its not the speeder stormtrooper! Claiming that the Rebels captured him, and the Imperials kept him at bay just in case is a ridiculous stretch. Why would they remove his helmet---? And if Episode II has taught us anything, its that stormtroopers are clones; thus, since he's not wearing a helmet, they should easily be able to tell whether or not he's an Imp. The moviemakers wouldn't have deliberately gone through so much trouble to suggest that, and then only just barely show it for a split second in one shot. I still say its a missing clue to a greater plot.
Don't be ridiculous; its not the speeder stormtrooper! Claiming that the Rebels captured him, and the Imperials kept him at bay just in case is a ridiculous stretch. Why would they remove his helmet---? And if Episode II has taught us anything, its that stormtroopers are clones; thus, since he's not wearing a helmet, they should easily be able to tell whether or not he's an Imp. The moviemakers wouldn't have deliberately gone through so much trouble to suggest that, and then only just barely show it for a split second in one shot. I still say its a missing clue to a greater plot.
H.R.M. DARVNIVS MAXIMVS EX TENEBRIS EXIT REX DEVSQVE GORONORVMQVE TENDORVM ROMANORVM ET GRÆCORVM OMNIS SEMPER EST