2nd October 2004, 6:12 PM
nickdaddyg Wrote:"um"s have nothing to do with anything. we're sorry Bush is like a normal person and sometimes has to think of the best word to use. I do it all the time, and I'm probably one of the smartest guys here.
They both didn't say much. I would've called it a tie, until Kerry talked his ideas on Iraq which are like the fricken same and different at the same time. It's like "Shit, nigger, pick ONE thing."
he votewd for action, the money, calls it the wrong war at the wrong place at the wrong time, expects he can motitvate Europeans to help when HE CALLS IT the wrong war at the wrong place at the wrong time. His whole 90% casuality point was supposed to deceive what all democrats think are "the dumb public." then he brought up how bin laden was most important, and that more troops from iraq should go to afghanistan, yet he thinks he arent equipped enough for iraq? why take them away them dumbass. and wait, isnt bin laden's location unknown? why go to afghanistan, that place is uinder control. and wasn't his FORMER hiding place in Pakistan anyway?
The one who would get more international help into iraq would be the iraqi leaders of the interim goverment, The U.S President would not have as much support if he tried.
Afghanistan is not 100% secure , Right now it just has a bandaid on it , We got 20 years of work to do , The warlords and Opium drug trade are a really bad problem since they likely give money and funding to terrorism. The Afghan goverment doesnt have the capacity to control the hole country infact its been 3 years after 9/11 and Karzai only controls whats going in kabul and its neighboring outskirts.The Taliban and Alqeada remnants are still active and doing attacks as well, We have to make sure that Al Qeada and the taliban are not crossing back into afghanistan from Pakistan .