22nd July 2004, 11:42 AM
Nader... what a sad man. He used to be a great consumer advocate but in the last few years blew every shred of his credibility. His insistence that he wasn't the critical difference between Bush and Gore, in several states, is a continuing farce. And more recently, he seems to have lost it. He's now accepting help from Republicans to get on ballots (who are only doing it to take votes from Kerry), while Democrats try to keep him off them... I guess he thinks 'by whatever means', but he's lost any credibility among a lot of people by acting like he has. As I said, sad.
As for 'for Bush/against Bush', that's Kerry's best hope. I wouldn't call him the best candidate ever, but compared to Bush... just about anyone the Democrats could put up against Bush would be a million years better.
As for 'for Bush/against Bush', that's Kerry's best hope. I wouldn't call him the best candidate ever, but compared to Bush... just about anyone the Democrats could put up against Bush would be a million years better.