28th June 2004, 8:35 AM
http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=st...reignty_23
Mr Bush keeps his word this time, To early to call victory though , We have to see how things go in the next few months.Good Improvement! I dont expect terrorism to end untill the U.S leaves and a elected iraq goverment is formed.The new interim Goverment will be a big target since the terrorist view it as a puppet goverment.
I still think going into iraq was not necessary and will not lead to peace with the islamic world and a end to terrorism you cannot go around reshaping the world by force as you see fit unless you can prove with solid evidence your at threat, I would have wanted a peaceful alternative then have 800 american young men killed,thousands of iraqis killed and injured plus all those beheadings and attacks. There was other ways of removing Saddam, Arming Kurds and othe rebels from each corner of iraq to the tie, Then provide air support and bomb and chip off all of Saddams forces like you did in Afghanistan and allow rebel factions to crush him. Putting legions of americans troops on sacred islamic soil makes it look like a total invasion and a cruisade conquest, Doing it the way I suggested above would have reduced american casualties and backlash from the muslims.
I dont want any of you thinking you can do this as many times as you see fit, Your very fortunate that iraq was not even nearly as bloody as Vietnam but it could have been.Nore have we seen the end of it.
The Arabs are not to be under estimated they beat the soviets, They crushed the english and the french. Saladin and the saracens defeated the Cruisaders which was a allied coalition of europeans.Osama Bin ladin caught you by the skin of your teeth and did the worse attack on american mainland soil in history since the civil war and WW2.Osama still lives and he is kicking and ploting with lots of help! We must seek peace and end the violence or we will be like isreal left with no hope or no escape.
As for Nato helping in iraq, Ive heard france and germany have agreed too.
Right now for canada that all depends on the election results, Our Prime Ministry cannot get involved in a conflict the same day he could be voted out of office.
They way things look.
1.Conservatives 100% certain they will send troops into iraq one way or another if elected.
2.liberals 90% certain they would as well , Paul Martin is no lover of Jean Chretien , I doubt Martin would have gotten involved last year , But I am sure he will send some troops for the sake of the iraqi interim goverment.
3.NDP 40% chance, Layton is more liberal then the liberals ,He has some anti american traits, Which is to bad he is a nice guy and alot of his plans for canada sounded good he was never a flip flop, But as much as I dislike Bush I dont want canada to have any rival amosity for the states we have been brothers and freinds for so long it would not be right, I am willing to live and coexist with George Bush if he respects us in return and maybe listen to our concerns.
Quote:BAGHDAD, Iraq - The U.S.-led coalition transferred sovereignty to an interim Iraqi government two days early Monday in a surprise move that apparently caught insurgents off guard, averting a feared campaign of attacks to sabotage the historic step toward self-rule.
Mr Bush keeps his word this time, To early to call victory though , We have to see how things go in the next few months.Good Improvement! I dont expect terrorism to end untill the U.S leaves and a elected iraq goverment is formed.The new interim Goverment will be a big target since the terrorist view it as a puppet goverment.
I still think going into iraq was not necessary and will not lead to peace with the islamic world and a end to terrorism you cannot go around reshaping the world by force as you see fit unless you can prove with solid evidence your at threat, I would have wanted a peaceful alternative then have 800 american young men killed,thousands of iraqis killed and injured plus all those beheadings and attacks. There was other ways of removing Saddam, Arming Kurds and othe rebels from each corner of iraq to the tie, Then provide air support and bomb and chip off all of Saddams forces like you did in Afghanistan and allow rebel factions to crush him. Putting legions of americans troops on sacred islamic soil makes it look like a total invasion and a cruisade conquest, Doing it the way I suggested above would have reduced american casualties and backlash from the muslims.
I dont want any of you thinking you can do this as many times as you see fit, Your very fortunate that iraq was not even nearly as bloody as Vietnam but it could have been.Nore have we seen the end of it.
The Arabs are not to be under estimated they beat the soviets, They crushed the english and the french. Saladin and the saracens defeated the Cruisaders which was a allied coalition of europeans.Osama Bin ladin caught you by the skin of your teeth and did the worse attack on american mainland soil in history since the civil war and WW2.Osama still lives and he is kicking and ploting with lots of help! We must seek peace and end the violence or we will be like isreal left with no hope or no escape.
As for Nato helping in iraq, Ive heard france and germany have agreed too.
Right now for canada that all depends on the election results, Our Prime Ministry cannot get involved in a conflict the same day he could be voted out of office.
They way things look.
1.Conservatives 100% certain they will send troops into iraq one way or another if elected.
2.liberals 90% certain they would as well , Paul Martin is no lover of Jean Chretien , I doubt Martin would have gotten involved last year , But I am sure he will send some troops for the sake of the iraqi interim goverment.
3.NDP 40% chance, Layton is more liberal then the liberals ,He has some anti american traits, Which is to bad he is a nice guy and alot of his plans for canada sounded good he was never a flip flop, But as much as I dislike Bush I dont want canada to have any rival amosity for the states we have been brothers and freinds for so long it would not be right, I am willing to live and coexist with George Bush if he respects us in return and maybe listen to our concerns.