17th June 2004, 1:51 PM
No, but I know exactly why that would suck. Okay, I guess what I was suggesting was more along the lines of a system link capable RTS.
Eh, anyway it just seems like a different KIND of thing that's been run into the ground. The Wars series from what I've read has basically always been a very simplistic thing. Fire Emblem is Nintendo's more complex strategy game series. I would like to see more freedom in Fire Emblem. Don't get me wrong, during the missions the strategy can vary a decent amount and all, but I'd like something along the lines of FFTA where I can actually freely choose my missions. Oh well, I guess that's why I nudge FFTA as my favorite tactics game right now.
Eh, anyway it just seems like a different KIND of thing that's been run into the ground. The Wars series from what I've read has basically always been a very simplistic thing. Fire Emblem is Nintendo's more complex strategy game series. I would like to see more freedom in Fire Emblem. Don't get me wrong, during the missions the strategy can vary a decent amount and all, but I'd like something along the lines of FFTA where I can actually freely choose my missions. Oh well, I guess that's why I nudge FFTA as my favorite tactics game right now.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)