26th May 2004, 4:15 PM
Can't booing be considered as free speech? And if it is a vast majority of people that are booing, then wouldn't you say the vast majority has the right to deny a person their right to speak? That's a very democratic process if you ask me.
The bill of rights is mostly there to protect you from the government. No one will be jailed or be fined for speaking against the president or for booing Doctorow. He had the right to say what he did, and the students had the right to boo him. If you're gutsy or dumb enough to have an anti-Bush rally at an inappropriate time or place, it's your own damn fault if people don't like it. Bite the fucking bullet and stop whining, Doctorow you fucking pussy.
The bill of rights is mostly there to protect you from the government. No one will be jailed or be fined for speaking against the president or for booing Doctorow. He had the right to say what he did, and the students had the right to boo him. If you're gutsy or dumb enough to have an anti-Bush rally at an inappropriate time or place, it's your own damn fault if people don't like it. Bite the fucking bullet and stop whining, Doctorow you fucking pussy.
