21st May 2004, 3:06 PM
Yes, it does also apply to Lazy's theory. :)
Oh, sure, I know that the "the developers didn't care" explanation is a bad one when you want to explain things. But it really DOES seem that a lot of the aspects of this series are explained by it, unfortunately. I really wish that Nintendo had paid more attention to the story and continuity...
So I think that that was Hyrule. What the game says is what happened. And things like how Ganon got out? Unexplained (though that 'Avatar' theory is easily the best one I've seen...). I hope that the next game keeps up telling a better story, like WW, but I'd also like more attention to continuity... Zelda games have never paid a whole lot of attention to the details of it, and it shows...
Oh, sure, I know that the "the developers didn't care" explanation is a bad one when you want to explain things. But it really DOES seem that a lot of the aspects of this series are explained by it, unfortunately. I really wish that Nintendo had paid more attention to the story and continuity...
So I think that that was Hyrule. What the game says is what happened. And things like how Ganon got out? Unexplained (though that 'Avatar' theory is easily the best one I've seen...). I hope that the next game keeps up telling a better story, like WW, but I'd also like more attention to continuity... Zelda games have never paid a whole lot of attention to the details of it, and it shows...