25th February 2003, 6:42 AM
regarding the hole nukes thing , I dont like the idea of living in a world were everybody pointing WMD at everyone else.All it takes is one man to make an error and launch nukes and all hell will break lose.Somtimes even things such as weather balloons can be mistaken for nukes if lets russia panicked and launched a few nukes to counter what they thought was an attack the implications would be desasterous.we've had close calls before.
The nuclear arsenal wont be destoryed all at once but if The U.S can make deals with other armed nations and in a treaty promising to dismantle a set percentage of nukes per year.
It can help reduce the threat of nuclear assaults.
Large stockpiles of weapons are dangerous especially if terrorist either buy them off the blackmarket or steal them. That is the problem in russia at this momment as well as pakistan.
smaller arsenals are easier to account for.
As for world war 2 though it is true you did warn them , but it proves the U.S is capable of targeting civilians if under tight pressure.America should take responsiblity stop researching and creatng new weapons of mass destruction, The U.S created An thrax look how much of a problem it is now.it killed more americans then anything else.Stop making viruses built to wipeout populations. Stop adding more stress to the world.
finally.
as for the war in irag get it over with , The canadian fleet is already standing by in the arabian golf to asssist the U.S.
for a posible war though our goverment isnt openly admiting to it.
Its pretty well a fact.
The solution is remove Suddams army without the army he has no power.bassically the U.S could convince The iragi Prime ministry or some other posible candidate to revolt and gain control of the Iragi army to then lead a inssurection agiast Suddam.As seen done to mislovic.
Dont get civilain to revolt if your not gonna back them up
undoubtingly that will fail.Alot more can be done to aid anti suddam iragi rebels.
If the U.S invades Irag it will only seem like the middle age cruisades giving osama bin ladin more supporters.
but unlike france and germany my country is willing to take that risk.
The nuclear arsenal wont be destoryed all at once but if The U.S can make deals with other armed nations and in a treaty promising to dismantle a set percentage of nukes per year.
It can help reduce the threat of nuclear assaults.
Large stockpiles of weapons are dangerous especially if terrorist either buy them off the blackmarket or steal them. That is the problem in russia at this momment as well as pakistan.
smaller arsenals are easier to account for.
As for world war 2 though it is true you did warn them , but it proves the U.S is capable of targeting civilians if under tight pressure.America should take responsiblity stop researching and creatng new weapons of mass destruction, The U.S created An thrax look how much of a problem it is now.it killed more americans then anything else.Stop making viruses built to wipeout populations. Stop adding more stress to the world.
finally.
as for the war in irag get it over with , The canadian fleet is already standing by in the arabian golf to asssist the U.S.
for a posible war though our goverment isnt openly admiting to it.
Its pretty well a fact.
The solution is remove Suddams army without the army he has no power.bassically the U.S could convince The iragi Prime ministry or some other posible candidate to revolt and gain control of the Iragi army to then lead a inssurection agiast Suddam.As seen done to mislovic.
Dont get civilain to revolt if your not gonna back them up
undoubtingly that will fail.Alot more can be done to aid anti suddam iragi rebels.
If the U.S invades Irag it will only seem like the middle age cruisades giving osama bin ladin more supporters.
but unlike france and germany my country is willing to take that risk.