7th January 2003, 12:02 AM
No, you dont know much about Star Trek. None of the Enterprises (all the way up to the E) are any longer than 700m... that's about 1/20th of the length of a SSD... a little more, if you take the 18km number instead of the 12.8km one.
Just go to one of the sites I linked (the Star Trek Ships one). Its got all the numbers for Trek ships.
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/schema...ships1.htm
Federation ship types list, A-K. Note the Galaxy-class (TNG's Ent-D) is 642 meters... the Ent-E is 682 meters, and its the longest ship we know of in the fleet. Trek just isn't designed to be able to cope with the capabilities of the Star Wars universe.
Oh, and I don't see how Nemesis could possibly be better than AotC in pretty much any way... its a good movie, but nowhere NEAR as good as AotC...
And any thread that 'proves' Trek is better is either resorting to relying from help from some godlike race ("Q would intervene") or is using some... creative... numbers.
Just go to one of the sites I linked (the Star Trek Ships one). Its got all the numbers for Trek ships.
http://www.ex-astris-scientia.org/schema...ships1.htm
Federation ship types list, A-K. Note the Galaxy-class (TNG's Ent-D) is 642 meters... the Ent-E is 682 meters, and its the longest ship we know of in the fleet. Trek just isn't designed to be able to cope with the capabilities of the Star Wars universe.
Oh, and I don't see how Nemesis could possibly be better than AotC in pretty much any way... its a good movie, but nowhere NEAR as good as AotC...
And any thread that 'proves' Trek is better is either resorting to relying from help from some godlike race ("Q would intervene") or is using some... creative... numbers.