24th February 2003, 7:10 PM
Capcom made the last three Zelda games (Ages, Seasons, and Four Swords) so this isn't surprising. I am surprised the article claims that Four Swords isn't a truly new game when in fact it is. I guess that it's just not a large enough game to warrent it being called it's own game aside something like LTTP. I can see that.
Anyway, I wonder what Capcom has up their sleeves for this... I bet they use the graphical style they made for Four Swords, which by the way looks beautiful so I have no beef with that. Some people say the Oracle games aren't quite as good as LTTP or Link's Awakening though. Maybe it's just that they didn't put many fresh ideas into the oracle games (apparently some people here didn't even like the neato seasons idea, well they didn't think it added that much to it anyway compaired to Age's time travel). Anyway, here's hoping whatever pops out is great.
Anyway, I wonder what Capcom has up their sleeves for this... I bet they use the graphical style they made for Four Swords, which by the way looks beautiful so I have no beef with that. Some people say the Oracle games aren't quite as good as LTTP or Link's Awakening though. Maybe it's just that they didn't put many fresh ideas into the oracle games (apparently some people here didn't even like the neato seasons idea, well they didn't think it added that much to it anyway compaired to Age's time travel). Anyway, here's hoping whatever pops out is great.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)