14th April 2004, 3:31 PM
Quote:But LttP or any of the billion other SNES GBA ports are?
Probably not if I already owned the games... and the only port I have on GBA is LttP...
Quote:We've already established that you are not sensitive to differences in graphics. You can't even tell the difference between 15 and 30 frames per second. There's your explanation.
Yeah, right, of course...

If any of the others are any different it is to no noticable degree and is irrelevant. Given that I DO notice it with this one, I think I would given that I've played all of them on GBC...
Quote:That's the equivalent of saying "Well aside from the fact that it has no textures, Bubsy 3D looks just as good as Mario 64".
So the lack of color means they don't look as good. So? That was the way things were. Did you constantly complain about it or something ... actually given you I can easily see you doing that... I never saw the point. I remember in some old issues of EGM one of the guys always complained that the GB games didn't have color and I thought it was really stupid to mention it so often... so they don't. So? That doesn't reflect badly on them given that that's the console they are on!
Quote:You don't have to worry about Sony's well-being. They know what they're doing.
Oh come on, what I'm doing is wondering what they will do!
Quote:They'd have to completely change the graphics, so it could never do straight ports.
Just greyscale them...
Quote:Sony doesn't release two versions of the same game (think Pokemon again) like Nintendo does, and Sony wouldn't charge $50 for an incomplete game like Four Swords. Sony's licensing fees are insanely low, their first-party games are ten dollars less than Nintendo's, and their budget titles are also ten dollars less than Nintendo's. Case CLOSED.
Sony would if they thought they could get away with it.