9th April 2004, 6:46 PM
A Black Falcon Wrote:Both Bush and Clinton people have said they didn't really concieve of something on the scale of 9/11. It's a fact. Oh we could expect SOMETHING but not anything near that scale... people were not thinking of it like that. You're wrong.
That's not the point. We should not have let him go because we didn't expect such an attack. We should have nailed him the first time he made any sort of attack. Besides, we SHOULD have expected something like 9-11, after all, the WTC was attacked by Al-Qaeda before 9-11! Had that attack been successful, the toll might have been far worse than 9-11. And Clinton did nothing, probably because it didn't turn out so bad.
A
Quote:nd he didn't 'refuse when Bin Laden was offered'! They had reasons why they couldn't act those few times when they thought they might get him!
Entertain me.
Quote: Just one more way people like you are an extreme danger to world peace and security. If you honestly think that international opinion doesn't matter then you (and all the fools who think like you) are utterly blind.
International opinion clashes with our interests. International opinion, in fact, often serves against our interests. So, why should we harm ourselves just to be popular?
Quote:Being shortsighted is skimping attacks on the real terrorists to get revenge. That's what YOU did, not people who think like me.
Whatever. Either you are incapable of comprehending the effect, or you choose to ignore it. Either way, you're wrong.
Quote: And of COURSE there's no way to make it better by improving world opinion! Nope! Impossible! Only solution must be conquering every other country there is!
Tell me then, what would make those radical Muslim murderers like us?
I'll tell you. They'd like us if we were dead. If you want to do that for their sake, be my guest. I personally prefer they were dead rather than myself.
YOU CANNOT HIDE FOREVER
WE STAND AT THE DOOR
WE STAND AT THE DOOR