9th April 2004, 6:34 PM
That's not a 'second creation', Genesis 2:4 begins the story, everything before it is like a synopsis of the Creation. 2:4 is where the details begin, and it restates some of what was in book 1. It's not the sort of writing structure anyone would use in contemporary literature, but it's not a second creation story, and honestly I've never even heard the idea put forth before.
I dunno how you got a 'second creation' out of that. Plus, it says Woman and Man are created much in the same way that one would say 'the twins were born', when it would be obviously inferred that one twin came first. You've read enough books to know better. You're just looking for the tiniest details, as if it discredits the very foundation of belief or something.
I dunno how you got a 'second creation' out of that. Plus, it says Woman and Man are created much in the same way that one would say 'the twins were born', when it would be obviously inferred that one twin came first. You've read enough books to know better. You're just looking for the tiniest details, as if it discredits the very foundation of belief or something.
YOU CANNOT HIDE FOREVER
WE STAND AT THE DOOR
WE STAND AT THE DOOR