25th March 2004, 3:58 PM
Removing him waisnt the bad part , Its how you did it , Making up a big story about WMD and trying to scare everyone and waisnt even true.If you guys had the made it the point that you would invade because he did crimes agiast humanity and was a evil element that would be a problem in the future things would be different, You didnt give the inspectors enough time and you werent patient if you would have waited you could have had U.N approval, Saddam was contained and waisnt a threat. The war in Iraq is not a war on terrorism just a crappy dictator who hates the jews,But now that you went you burned up your resources and alienated all your allies and if there is another necessary military action like afghanistan somewhere else you wont have the resources and you will be tied up in Iraq.
The reason I brought up that picture , Is that if Rumfeld had a shread of morality he would not have supported saddam and give any weapons too shady dangerous men just in the sole interest of the U.S, I think what he did in the 80's says alot about him today.
The reason I brought up that picture , Is that if Rumfeld had a shread of morality he would not have supported saddam and give any weapons too shady dangerous men just in the sole interest of the U.S, I think what he did in the 80's says alot about him today.