Nintendo's next Fantasy

[OB1]

First off, how can you be dissapinted in me when you never apointed me to begin with. Apparently every single time I disagree with you you "loose all respect for me". That's apparently supposed to make me feel "bad" or something, as though your opinion of me matters at all.

Do you mean "lose"? :nodding:

I've also offerend plenty of proof of my claims. The title screen SAYS "The Legend of Zelda A Link to the Past Four Swords. It doesn't HAVE a slash in it, though it's implied, so I was fully correct in saying that was right.

The two titles are clearly separated.

You actually claim I started it eh? Well try reading the thread. I said "we already have Four Swords". You said "the full title of the game is actually The Legend of Zelda A Link to the Past Plus all new multiplayer adventure Four Swords", for whatever reason. YOU started it.

Wrong again! You corrected me by calling it "Four Swords+".

I changed my argument? That's what I thought to start with! Of COURSE it's two games in one! Never said it wasn't! I was just saying what the official FULL title of the game is. Now you can call the box that title if you want, I guess, but you were trying to say that was the ONLY correct title. It could ALSO just be called A Link to the Past all by itself and that would be correct on it's own rights too. You gave ground when you said what I said only with a slash, and then you claimed I was saying something else.

You ONLY said that the full title was both game titles combined and therefor made it seem as though you thought they were one game. What you THOUGHT and what you WROTE are two VERY different things. Also, I never said that there is only ONE title to the series. At first I corrected you by writing one of the title, and nowhere did I imply that that was the SOLE title.

Look, you don't even seem to want to acknowledge that the title I give is the ONLY one on both the cart and the game's own title screen. Show me where in the game itself it shows something else. Honestly, most people just throw away the boxes, so your odd title was just very weird.

Right, the box is just SO unofficial. The cart cover clearly separates the two titles. It is not one long title as you claim.

Okay, let's just try this then. You accept that my title is right, and I'll go ahead and accept that your title, which is an odd way to read the box, but still I guess can be considered A correct title. Compromise? Also, you accept that you started the whole thing, and I'll accept that I continued it which is also a fault.

Uh, no because you are still wrong. Also, you started this when you corrected the name.

But since this argument is so ridiculous (I actually thought you were kidding at first... guess it's NOT below you) I will agree to drop it.