1st March 2004, 4:13 PM
I was disagreeing with the entire article as presented due to the time travel aspect. The possibility of it existing without time travel was much more likely yes, that I would have believed I think. However, that article didn't say it wouldn't have time travel, that it would. I take each story I read all or none unless the qualifyer of "maybe" is involved regarding some element. It's irresponsible not to. Now, you were only arguing for it's existance, okay then. That's well and good, and you had some other article just stating it existed. I hadn't seen that, and was ONLY addressing what I saw. It still stands, since that's what most people reading that thread saw and they took the time travel as part of the main article.
No matter, at any rate I'll make it clear I was never saying "you are wrong" because I honestly wasn't debating with you. I was arguing with the article itself, VIA you. You were a 3rd party, unimportant, not the subject of interest.
No matter, at any rate I'll make it clear I was never saying "you are wrong" because I honestly wasn't debating with you. I was arguing with the article itself, VIA you. You were a 3rd party, unimportant, not the subject of interest.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)