11th February 2004, 5:38 AM
A Black Falcon Wrote:If not for religion people would see no difference between a family with a heterosexual couple and one with a homosexual couple (who adopts). That is a fact. So saying that it will destroy the family is an absolute lie with zero truth to it. What it'll do is hurt the right-wing religious extremist idea of the family, but IMO that is a good thing...For starters, you obviously didn't read his post, for he says he is irreligious. Secondly, what is this bullshit about the 'right-wing religious extremist' idea of a family? Oh wait, it's the type of family that's BEEN AROUND SINCE THE DAWN OF MANKIND. What could POSSIBLY be good about hurting or destroying this? Even in the period of my life when I was irreligious, when I was purposefully antipathetic towards religion as you are, I had the same views on the subject. I won't continue though, N_A said it better.
And also you use "behavior" like you mean "choice" which has essentially been proven to be false.
It's wrong to generalize all liberals, but you in particular seem to want to take every single institution people follow and erase them for... whatever reason you could possibly have. You come across like a suicidal maniac who wants to destroy everything he can before he dies. You said it yourself, the only reason you want to destroy the traditional family is because, you mistakenly assume, that only conservatives view it as right and moral.
Hate to tell you this, but you're a maniac. It's not even a matter of liberal and conservative, it's sane and insane. You are a lunatic, and it's about time you realize that most people do not think like you and resent being forced to think like you.
This is further evidenced by your last post, where you tell someone with a medical degree that you know more than he does about genetics. Heh.
YOU CANNOT HIDE FOREVER
WE STAND AT THE DOOR
WE STAND AT THE DOOR