28th January 2004, 1:09 PM
I've played LA probably five times through... and yes I don't own LADX and have only played it some, but my initial response at least was that the colors were weird. :)
Then why is it that when I said that you responded with a "you're nuts"?
You contradicted your own "always"... and as I've said many times in this thread. How often does this happen? How many 'graphical only with no significant gameplay changes' remakes are there? Oh, there are lots of remakes/sequels out there, but almost always they change stuff even in a remake. I can't think of any other than SM All-Stars that actually didn't change the gameplay at all... even most GBC/A remakes changed something, like F-Zero being a new game on the same engine, LADX adding stuff and having color, other remakes mixing things... and most of the rest are straight ports, not remakes. So this category you are describing is just so small that it's impossible to just talk about it by itsself!
Quote:Gameplay is more important than graphics, duh. We all know that.
Then why is it that when I said that you responded with a "you're nuts"?
Quote:But same game with better graphics is always better, as long as it's not say, Mario Bros. turned into a photorealistic version of the game with life-like characters.
You contradicted your own "always"... and as I've said many times in this thread. How often does this happen? How many 'graphical only with no significant gameplay changes' remakes are there? Oh, there are lots of remakes/sequels out there, but almost always they change stuff even in a remake. I can't think of any other than SM All-Stars that actually didn't change the gameplay at all... even most GBC/A remakes changed something, like F-Zero being a new game on the same engine, LADX adding stuff and having color, other remakes mixing things... and most of the rest are straight ports, not remakes. So this category you are describing is just so small that it's impossible to just talk about it by itsself!