6th February 2003, 11:04 PM
No proof for the genetics argument?
Didn't think so.
I agree that Age, gender and race should have protections. They're not choices. Sexual preference and religion are choices. However, you should not disclose those to your employers. They cannot discriminate against you if they don't know what you are.
I've outlined, in detail, my position, and gave very sound psychogical explanations. All you've done to counter is say "You're wrong". Never detailing why. Using genetics but never offering even so much as conjecture as to why that could be. So please, provide proof of your own insane positions before you demand it of me.
That a person is sexual is not a choice. WHO they are sexual with is a choice. I hate repeating myself because you'll just say I'm wrong (most likely without proving it), and then we're at square one again. So keep being blind. That's a choice too, you know.
Didn't think so.
I agree that Age, gender and race should have protections. They're not choices. Sexual preference and religion are choices. However, you should not disclose those to your employers. They cannot discriminate against you if they don't know what you are.
I've outlined, in detail, my position, and gave very sound psychogical explanations. All you've done to counter is say "You're wrong". Never detailing why. Using genetics but never offering even so much as conjecture as to why that could be. So please, provide proof of your own insane positions before you demand it of me.
That a person is sexual is not a choice. WHO they are sexual with is a choice. I hate repeating myself because you'll just say I'm wrong (most likely without proving it), and then we're at square one again. So keep being blind. That's a choice too, you know.
YOU CANNOT HIDE FOREVER
WE STAND AT THE DOOR
WE STAND AT THE DOOR