3rd January 2004, 12:34 PM
Er... no, you are wrong. Civ III wasn't "fixing a mistake". It was "adding a feature". That feature is high culture expanding your city zone of control. As far as territory goes it is a major feature addition, for sure, because it lets you take over enemy zones of control and even cities if you have high enough culture... but you act like its lack in Civ II is actually a bug or something! Absurd! Oh, sure, enemies do that in Civ II and it's annoying, but I know that people complain about that very same problem in Civ III... as I said, the only difference is that you can expand your control zone... which is nice but not as dramatically different as you suggest.