15th November 2003, 4:56 PM
The Arguement was the advance vs the unadvanced, Going back to history, But giving a cure to a desease isnt the same as handing them a bomb.
How do they know that they wont get so desperate they will round up and experiment on the primitives like guinea pigs anyways?They could also find the cure themselves and dominate the planet anyways, So if you had a cure their isnt much of a reason not to give it unless you enjoy watching millions die.
The arguement that interfering will cause more damage is like saying why give aids medicine to africa! It is a poor arguement , Were as maybe handing technology especially weapons would be questionable but not needed medicine.
How do they know that they wont get so desperate they will round up and experiment on the primitives like guinea pigs anyways?They could also find the cure themselves and dominate the planet anyways, So if you had a cure their isnt much of a reason not to give it unless you enjoy watching millions die.
The arguement that interfering will cause more damage is like saying why give aids medicine to africa! It is a poor arguement , Were as maybe handing technology especially weapons would be questionable but not needed medicine.