30th January 2003, 3:34 PM
Inferior? Why? The graphics? Sure, SML doesn't have very good graphics... and it is pretty short at just 12 stages. But its fun! It plays in many ways like Super Mario Bros., but with differences... like the two scrolling shooter stages. Or the different locations... how the different stages were really different in looks.
As good as SMB? No... but a good platformer? Definitely. Its a good game... and the second one is better... and has good graphics, too.
I will say, though, it would have been nice if they were as long as the major console ones. They really are too short.
Of course, SML was the first Mario game I owned... but I had played some of the NES games before that (and I got Kirby's Dream Land at the same time... that was a good game too...).
As good as SMB? No... but a good platformer? Definitely. Its a good game... and the second one is better... and has good graphics, too.
I will say, though, it would have been nice if they were as long as the major console ones. They really are too short.
Of course, SML was the first Mario game I owned... but I had played some of the NES games before that (and I got Kirby's Dream Land at the same time... that was a good game too...).
![[Image: logo_bos_79x76.jpg]](https://www.tendocity.net/logo_bos_79x76.jpg){kind=logo}