30th January 2003, 3:29 PM
(This post was last modified: 30th January 2003, 3:40 PM by Private Hudson.)
Quote:Originally posted by OB1
So.. is it a pathetic game because it's better than MGS2 and that really makes you mad? Or is it a pathetic game because you live in some sort of bizarro world where cel-shading has an opposite meaning and crappy games are good and vice versa?
I disliked it because it's level designs were so linear. I was expecting a whole heap of missions similar to the Tanker level in MGS2, and what I got was a whole heap of missions similar to the stealth segments of Syphon Filter (but with pretty lighting). Everything I said about the demo (remember my thread?) turned out to be true. And the game was just a bore.
Why would I care if some people think it's better than MGS2?

Quote:I own all of the consoles and I play all video games so I have no need to be a biased fanboy
Just because you have no need to be a fanboy, doesn't mean you're not. I own all three console (5 if you count DC and GBA) and I won't deny I have an affinity for my GCN the most, despite the fact that I play my PS2 far more.
And Sega are better than Nintendo .:p
If i had a dollar for every time i ran out of hair in the middle of a spoon making contest id only eat your children with a side of slaw and THOSE ARENT PILLOWS!!