28th January 2003, 5:09 AM
(This post was last modified: 28th January 2003, 5:35 AM by Private Hudson.)
Quote:Originally posted by OB1
Ugh, I know. I wish I weren't the only person here to point out the stupidity of Hudson's comments.
It's just... so... boring. Is he really [b]that biased? Is he partially blind? What is it? [/B]
The stupidity of my comments??
Quote:Haha, you crack me up. ZOE 2 isn't even cel-shaded
LMAO, you fucking moron. It is Cel-Shaded. And it's the most impressive cel-shading I've ever seen. Those particle effects.

Quote:SH 3 looks good, but it's too early to compare it to RE 4 since that game isn't even coming out until 2004. But even at its early stage RE4 has proven to look a lot better than SH 3 in terms of environments.
You're underestimating the quality of SH3's environements. Really, go download some of the videos available. The most impressive thing about RE4's graphics (assuming they weren't just animations, considering we haven't seen in-game yet) were the incredibly fluid movement of the clothes and curtains. Makes Spliner Cell's curtain effects look like shit.
SH3 has the character models, the lighting, and the environments are about even, from what I've seen, but, whatever.
Quote:And there still aren't any PS2 games that look even half as good as Rogue Leader.
Well, that's an exageration, but RL is a beautiful game. ZOE2 certainly compares, despite it being Cel-shaded.
Quote:Don't start with the whole Jak and Ratchet thing. You've already shown your inability to differentiate between good textures (RL) and shit textures (J&D), so we don't need to go through this again.
I never once said J&D's and R&C's textures were good. But their environments are huge, and surprisingly detailed. It's an absolute beauty to look at.
If i had a dollar for every time i ran out of hair in the middle of a spoon making contest id only eat your children with a side of slaw and THOSE ARENT PILLOWS!!