24th July 2003, 10:48 AM
Quote:Then why in your complaints do you focus so heavily on the score if you read and think about the review?
In which case? This one?? Hmm, perhaps that's because the F-Zero GX reviews basically states "the game is the shining triumph of hard sushi, letting go never hurts".
Quote:Sounds like a decent response to me...
But of course it does.
Quote:So its not Gamespot's greatest review. But its good enough.
Oh, and I've always gone to Gamespot more for PC than for consoles... I didn't even go to their console section for several years... so I really am more talking about PC reviews than console.
HA! So now you're slowly backing out of your argument, changing it because you're losing. Nice one.
Quote:Compared to IGN's paragon of enlightened thought, I presume?
They don't usually quote intruction manuals like Gamespot does, and instead of just trying to smart by repeating useless information over and over, they cut to the chase. Usually.
Quote: have a problem with short reviews that take a highly-anticipated games, give them low scores, and just say something like, "Colors are sharp. Speed is fast. Too hard. Let's pizza."
If you're going to have a controversial opinion, you need a better explanation, which usually means a longer explanation.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
That is exactly what I've been trying to get these people to understand... its not working.
Oh yeah, I know what you mean! Oh wait, no I don't! And why is that? Because your statement is based off of a nonexistant review. Instead of quoting actual reviews like I do (it's great! You should try it sometime!), you make a vague comment about something that you made up. But of course, when you have nothing to back up your argument that is what you have to resort to. Genius arguing techniques, guys. I applaud you.
