21st July 2003, 1:37 PM
![[Image: dctholus.gif]](http://www.t3armageddon.com/dctholus.gif)
![[Image: rosscyd.gif]](http://www.t3armageddon.com/rosscyd.gif)
![[Image: wagecyds.gif]](http://www.t3armageddon.com/wagecyds.gif)
There evidence is extremely sketchy at best. Take these pictures for example: when you acount for scale and the differences in the cardinal directions, this doesn't really prove anything except that a picture of some rocks on Mars kind of looks like some buildings in Washington D.C., but you have to squint your eyes and tilt your head a bit.
![[Image: gtseal3.gif]](http://www.t3armageddon.com/gtseal3.gif)
They're REALLY grasping for straws with this.
Quote:The Monuments of Mars, a book written by Hoagland, lays out the discovery of a geometric pattern encoded into the ruins of an ancient City and a Face like structure at Cydonia. This pattern shows that the artifacts at Cydonia are artificial in nature and were built by some race of intelligent beings.
If that was even remotely true wouldn't more people be talking about it? I mean, that's pretty big if it's true.
Sometimes you get the scorpion.