12th June 2003, 5:48 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Dark Jaguar
Hmm, well I really don't care about the graphics, as all the gameplay could be done just as well in 2D. So then, why do you think they did a bad job with this one? Sure, it's different than Starcraft, but if you wanted Starcraft then just play Starcraft. That game DOES still exist after all. They purposfully reduced the army sizes one can have, so strategy is more important than quick army building, and made a set of units you must have if you wish to survive, the heros, to really change the gameplay. There are still many strategies one can use, possibly endless. Personally, I think WC3 rocks.
However, I would like to hear why you think the opposite. I'm just curious.
I don't know, for sure. I didn't like StarCraft either. I like Real-time strategy games, but for some reason, Warcraft III just didn't do anything for me. I just couldn't make myself like it, as much as my wallet (sixty dollars lighter) and past experience (enjoyed WC2) wanted me to.
The Earthworker Race has ended. Everybody wins.