8th June 2003, 12:16 PM
Quote:If the American people weren't so stupid, it'd be looking very bad for Bush. But they are, so they seem to forget very fast that he lied about Iraq's WMD (as opposed to Sadaam Hussein, who actually told the truth about the issue), lied when he said that Iraq was directly linked to 9/11 (all they did were allow some Al Quaida-connected terrorists to live in the country)...
Its sounds like you almost believe Saddam is a saint and that some how his words have actually more credibility then Bush.
Some Kuwaities would shoot you dead for what you just said.
This is the same man who had his own grandchildren executed to punnish their parents.
"We cant find Saddam Hussein that must mean he didnt exist"!
That exactly how it sound in regards to your statement.
Saddam Openly supported Terrorism agiast isreal he gave millions of dollar to suicide bombers and helped finance their activities , Not to mention he used suicide bombers on the U.S army in Iraq , therefore he is in support of that kind of brutality.
They also discoverd mass graves of people who were executed or even buried alive , whos only crime was saying the wrong thing at the wrong time. His sons have comited atrocious crimes such as rape and murder.
Saddam Hussein attacked isreal in the first gulf war and like I said before has financed and given support to Islamic terrorist groups , There was also a document found recently that had Bin Ladins name in a goverment archive in one of Saddams Pallaces. Which had some parts whited out.
The reason Saddam never used his WMD is that if he did he would only prove Bush right for attacking him.
So he had them scatterd and dismantled into hundreds of parts and tranferd all over Iraq and then buried them so even if they were discoverd parts of it nobody would be abled to prove they had that capability. As Saddam only left bits and pieces of it.
If Saddam Hussein didnt have weapons then why did he give the world such a hard time to keep inspectors in his country in 98 and afterward.