1st June 2003, 10:32 AM
Quote:Originally posted by OB1
I'm talking about your amazing rebuttal techniques. For two of those replies all you wrote was "Incorrect" without explaining why.
That is because no further discussion was necessary.
Dark Jaguar made the statements:
Quote:Originally posted by Dark Jaguar
To make it clear, I played both games side by side to compair them...The ONLY gameplay changes are the dungeon and the photo gathering
That is an incorrect statement. My previous reply to an earlier statement was:
Quote:Incorrect. They've moved some keys to chests nearer the entrance (find them sooner) or in less obscure places (find them eaiser). If you want a specific example, then post a link to a GBC EMU and DX ROM as I never bought the DX, just borrowed from a friend. I'll spend 30 minutes playing, and list the specific examples.
Why should I type all of that over again, if the word <B>incorrect</B> would let him know that his statement about the ONLY gameplay changes are the dungeon and the photo gathering was wrong?
He stated SEVERAL things as fact that weren't true.
Quote:Claims that chests and such have changed are false.
I said Incorrect. Now, if he said that such claims are FALSE, then my reply of Incorrect would infer that such clames are TRUE...examples already given previously in the post. I assume that posters here can actually read that I had already proven the inaccuracy of his statement.
Example:
If you were to state that the sky is green, would I really need to say anything more than that you are incorrect, or could you maybe infer that you're incorrect because the sky is blue without me saying it's blue?
You're just looking to argue with me.