17th June 2010, 10:19 PM
Oh, and Zelda's Adventure too... :p
But yes, it is true that most Zelda games have "pair" titles.
... Actually, storyline-wise, WW and TP are sort of "pairs", in that both are set at what might be somewhat similar times, just in different timelines... though of course WW also has PH, it's still true.
On that note, ST is also stand-alone... that's not the WW/PH Link, even if he looks a lot like him.
Also, this game is kind of halfway in between WW and TP graphically, so I don't know how to count it exactly... like a hybrid of the two, in style, I guess? In gameplay, we will see. Evidently it might be denser in terms of content than TP; I think one of the interviews said something about them saying that they wanted to have more 'stuff' to do in each area than there was in TP, and that they were doing that in the next game. Might be a denser world then, like MM did in comparison to OoT? Maybe smaller, maybe not... about that we will have to see.
But yes, it is true that most Zelda games have "pair" titles.
... Actually, storyline-wise, WW and TP are sort of "pairs", in that both are set at what might be somewhat similar times, just in different timelines... though of course WW also has PH, it's still true.
On that note, ST is also stand-alone... that's not the WW/PH Link, even if he looks a lot like him.
Also, this game is kind of halfway in between WW and TP graphically, so I don't know how to count it exactly... like a hybrid of the two, in style, I guess? In gameplay, we will see. Evidently it might be denser in terms of content than TP; I think one of the interviews said something about them saying that they wanted to have more 'stuff' to do in each area than there was in TP, and that they were doing that in the next game. Might be a denser world then, like MM did in comparison to OoT? Maybe smaller, maybe not... about that we will have to see.
![[Image: logo_bos_79x76.jpg]](https://www.tendocity.net/logo_bos_79x76.jpg){kind=logo}