23rd March 2008, 8:31 AM
The master of descriptive thread titles strikes again!
And, yes, he's absolutely right. It's not enough that sequels be good games, they also have to rigidly conform to everything that its predecessor did. Unless, of course, we didn't like the last game. In that case, the new sequel had better be different or there will hell to pay!
For example: ABF is upset, or however you want to say it, that Fallout 3 is going to be different from Fallout 1 and 2. It's first-person, not really turn-based, and doesn't have the same writers as the previous games. This makes him ANGRY. On the other hand, SSBB is just too similar to SSBM. Why couldn't Nintendo have changed things up and made it more interesting instead of just updating the roster and level list? Angry!
:FuckYou:
And, yes, he's absolutely right. It's not enough that sequels be good games, they also have to rigidly conform to everything that its predecessor did. Unless, of course, we didn't like the last game. In that case, the new sequel had better be different or there will hell to pay!
For example: ABF is upset, or however you want to say it, that Fallout 3 is going to be different from Fallout 1 and 2. It's first-person, not really turn-based, and doesn't have the same writers as the previous games. This makes him ANGRY. On the other hand, SSBB is just too similar to SSBM. Why couldn't Nintendo have changed things up and made it more interesting instead of just updating the roster and level list? Angry!
:FuckYou:
Sometimes you get the scorpion.