8th February 2008, 12:34 AM
So for you the problem is his jokes are TOO close to Bill O'Reily, uncanny even, truly the master of mimicry. Funny thing is that biologist Richard Dawkins didn't get that it was parody at first either.
I guess someone could be fooled, but that's because when it comes to these nuts a rule seems to be that it's impossible to form parody of it that isn't a view held seriously by someone with net access. I still find it hilarious, and really since he so very well dissects the terrible logic by USING it against them, you really can't be too sickened by it.
I guess someone could be fooled, but that's because when it comes to these nuts a rule seems to be that it's impossible to form parody of it that isn't a view held seriously by someone with net access. I still find it hilarious, and really since he so very well dissects the terrible logic by USING it against them, you really can't be too sickened by it.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)