15th April 2003, 10:50 PM
Well there ya go. You see, stuff like the credits mentioning people working at Nintendo and such is what I call evidence that makes the story more believable. You really should have said that in the first place. And really, it's not so major a deal to ask for a little proove of some claims. The fact is, you never gave any proof whatsoever to start with, so I just asked for some. Compairing this to something that actually matters is just silly talk of course. What does something actually important like World War 2 have to do with this? The difference is they actually had some evidence, whereas none was provided here (oh, and the fact that this is a minor issue). Now then, I don't think I'll ask for proof that the names in the credits actually were there, I'll just go ahead and believe ya. Now from now on, there's no need to develop an attitude. Simply provide such proof as this and the situation is resolved peacefully.
Really, why did I get targetted here? What exactly was it that I did SO wrong as to garner anger? It's very reasonable to ask for proove of anything sounding like an urban legend. What's not reasonable was what you expected me to do, which was take it at face value with no proof whatsoever.
Really, why did I get targetted here? What exactly was it that I did SO wrong as to garner anger? It's very reasonable to ask for proove of anything sounding like an urban legend. What's not reasonable was what you expected me to do, which was take it at face value with no proof whatsoever.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)