15th April 2003, 9:14 PM
Um, but the ROM isn't proof though. It's not a hard concept. NA didn't once say anything to proove it, just "get the ROM if you need proof", which of course isn't proof of anything other than the fact it was translated. And no, you don't need to do anything. I never expected you to actually proove it, I just expected you to let it be really. Here's the deal. When the GBA game comes out, if the translation is exactly, or almost exactly, the same as the ROM out there, that'll be enough for me. Of course, if it's not, that doesn't proove that this didn't happen of course. Me saying that would be absurd, since they could have just decided to retranslate it. I'm just saying that would be the kind of evidence that would proove it. How might it be disprooven? I really can't think of any way to disproove it.
Anyway, as I said I'm going with a little faith here that N_A isn't just making up stories, so I'll just go with some blind faith as proof.
Anyway, as I said I'm going with a little faith here that N_A isn't just making up stories, so I'll just go with some blind faith as proof.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)