29th March 2007, 5:10 PM
Quote:I'm not wrong. Developers for the PS3 don't have to do anything regarding PSN. Microsoft made it mandatory that all 360 games are Live aware at the very least.
Oh come on... when you compare what Sony does for online policy to what Nintendo does, Sony looks really, really good. Microsoft has better? Of course! That's not the point! The point is that Sony's, flawed as it is, is almost infinitely superior to Nintendo's online network. Really, even if PS3 games aren't required to be online- aware, at least if developers want to they CAN make their games online on that platform, with a decent, if not fanastic, online featureset...
Quote:The 360 can have wi-fi. AFAIK, the Wii can't. (...)
Wi-fi is not necessary, and it shouldn't be included in every set because not everyone will have a need for it. Why make those who don't need it or want it pay for it?
Wha... huh? Wii IS wi-fi. You only get wired if you buy the wired adaptor ($40). Out of the box, it's wi-fi or nothing. (and I know I have complained about that before...)
Quote:Again, online play is not necessary. You can access all the other features there are to offer for free.
What do you mean by this?