Sorry, Miller.

[Weltall]

Who else can have a game were he completed 31% of his passes, threw for 34 yards, zero touchdows, and three interceptions - and still WIN?

All that does is prove my point; he won because the team around him is good enough to make up for his ineptitude.

Grossman had several good games, against poor teams. He also had some historically horrible games against some crappy opponents. A 10.3 rating against the freaking Cardinals? 1.3 against the Vikings, who had one of the worst pass-defense ratings in the league? A perfect 0.0 against Green Bay? 36.8 against Miami? Not one of these teams had a winning record. He's very streaky, very inconsistent, and the only reason his stats are as good as they are is because he plays for a very good team playing a very poor division in a weak conference. If the Bears played in any AFC division, they might win 9 games if they were lucky, and Grossman's play would be consistently worse. He's not special, and while I can't say he won't one day find his groove, so far he's done nothing that makes him look like anything more than a career backup.