8th November 2006, 11:30 PM
If they were the same game, how could those GBA ports of SNES games say "Only for Game Boy Advance" in the corner? :D
... yeah, I know, they are the same game, but I do think that every version of each game needs to be rated separately, even if it's the exact same thing on a new platform. Why else would they be rating them, if there is no other new content (if there is something added you do need it re-rated...)?
FFIV for the GBA is more censored than the original version (or at least the Japanese GBA version is more censored than the Japanese Super Famicom version, I believe...), I think... for ratings presumably...
... yeah, I know, they are the same game, but I do think that every version of each game needs to be rated separately, even if it's the exact same thing on a new platform. Why else would they be rating them, if there is no other new content (if there is something added you do need it re-rated...)?
Quote:I think we all just assumed there would be no issues at all with Nintendo just shoving all their games onto a server's hard disk and setting up a pricing structure. If that was all it took, then it would be easy to see having access to pretty much the ENTIRE library of, at least, Nintendo's own games available at launch. Unfortunatly, if each game has to be rated, now Nintendo will have to make some "choices". What is worth the price of an ESRB rating? What content should be EDITED to get the rating for the demographic we want? Business, as per usual, ruins EVERYTHING!
FFIV for the GBA is more censored than the original version (or at least the Japanese GBA version is more censored than the Japanese Super Famicom version, I believe...), I think... for ratings presumably...
![[Image: logo_bos_79x76.jpg]](https://www.tendocity.net/logo_bos_79x76.jpg){kind=logo}