23rd April 2010, 10:25 PM
http://kotaku.com/5523238/capcom-apologi...-fight-drm
Wow... Is there really an excuse of this? Aside from lying about "previous PS3 games using the same protection" (no one's been able to back that up, including Sony), it's just insulting. Single player modes should always be accessable offline.
Apparently they are "combating PSN sharing". Considering the system has yet to be succesfully hacked (a merely potential and already defeated one notwithstanding), it seems that shouldn't be an issue. Yeah games can be copied to other systems, but they are still locked to the original PSN ID. This is the sort of compromise that's been in place for a long time. It's been settled, and this nonsense is not going to help Sony catch up to MS, a company that does NOT pull this sort of thing.
Wow... Is there really an excuse of this? Aside from lying about "previous PS3 games using the same protection" (no one's been able to back that up, including Sony), it's just insulting. Single player modes should always be accessable offline.
Apparently they are "combating PSN sharing". Considering the system has yet to be succesfully hacked (a merely potential and already defeated one notwithstanding), it seems that shouldn't be an issue. Yeah games can be copied to other systems, but they are still locked to the original PSN ID. This is the sort of compromise that's been in place for a long time. It's been settled, and this nonsense is not going to help Sony catch up to MS, a company that does NOT pull this sort of thing.
"On two occasions, I have been asked [by members of Parliament], 'Pray, Mr. Babbage, if you put into the machine wrong figures, will the right answers come out?' I am not able to rightly apprehend the kind of confusion of ideas that could provoke such a question." ~ Charles Babbage (1791-1871)