Tendo City
FUCKERS! - Printable Version

+- Tendo City (https://www.tendocity.net)
+-- Forum: Tendo City: Metropolitan District (https://www.tendocity.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Ramble City (https://www.tendocity.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=44)
+--- Thread: FUCKERS! (/showthread.php?tid=5549)

Pages: 1 2 3


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 5th March 2010

1. no mistake

Then I assume you place it there to trick me somehow, but I don't see how it matters; the points remain valid no matter what fetus it is. Whether or not its human or not doesn't at all change the argument.

2. Invitro fertilization and people saving their reproductive material for future use, Typically because of cancer.

I'm going to reserve comment on that because the discussion is about abortion. This thread has always gone from atheism-religion to abortion-anti-abortion. Let's keep it on topic for a day.

3. Sperm is life and so is the egg prior to being combined,when they are combined its just a lump of cells for the first 2 weeks.

Sperm is not life in my opinion, and neither is an egg fresh from the ovary. When they combine they are life.

4. What if she threw herself down the stairs intentionally or engaged in a dangerous activity while pregnant causing a miscarriage?

If it wasn't intentional I would not file charges. If it was a deliberate effort to cause the miscarriage, it'd be the same as abortion.

5. If your saying they are a human life, Why wait till they are born? Unless you admit they are not a person.

Because they may not be born.


FUCKERS! - EdenMaster - 5th March 2010

Sperm is not life in my opinion, and neither is an egg fresh from the ovary. When they combine they are life.

Sperm is not life in my opinion

not life in my opinion

in my opinion

I hope I've illustrated clearly enough why this whole argument is unwinnable. It's all opinions. You differ on opinions of what is and is not life. What makes his opinion that sperm and eggs are not life different from your opinion that a mass of gunk 3 weeks after the two come together?


FUCKERS! - Geno - 5th March 2010

Bacteria are life. A tapeworm is life. Sperm is life. It's not a debate over what constitutes life so much as a debate over when taking life is acceptable (anyone have any gripes over me washing my hands or brushing my teeth?) and when it isn't.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 5th March 2010

Does semen really count as life? How?


FUCKERS! - Weltall - 5th March 2010

Any cellular substrate that self-sustains biological function is, technically, life.


FUCKERS! - alien space marine - 5th March 2010

[Image: game-over.jpg]


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 5th March 2010

Game over?

Another strang law of philosophy? This is a strange school of thought, this ABF School.

IF SEMEN IS LIFE

then

ABORTION IS JUST


Fail logic.

And no dice, monsignor.


FUCKERS! - Geno - 5th March 2010

A. Semen is life.
B. Abortion is wrong because it takes life.
C. Therefore, masturbation is murder. Birth control and condoms are also bad.

This message brought to you by the Catholic Church.

<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/fUspLVStPbk&hl=en_US&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/fUspLVStPbk&hl=en_US&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 5th March 2010

Quote:B. Abortion is wrong because it takes life.

To argue this is the claim that US soliders in Afghanistan are wrong when they kill Taliban insurgents, and poultry farmers are wrong when they provide us with chicken.

This argument is not about all life. It's about abortion.

Abortion is wrong because is impedes, prevents, and kills, a human-in-the-making that would otherwise one day grow to adulthood.


FUCKERS! - alien space marine - 5th March 2010

Darunia Wrote:Abortion is wrong because is impedes, prevents, and kills, a human-in-the-making that would otherwise one day grow to adulthood.

[Image: game_over_big.jpg]


End of discussion


FUCKERS! - Fittisize - 5th March 2010

Darunia Wrote:The fault of the rapist my good sir.


Allow me to explain it to you in means with which I can better illustrate.

CHUCK RAPES SUE.

SUE IS IMPREGNATED.

(Enter Little Chuck)

CHUCK GOES TO JAIL.

SUE: Eegads! Get this thing out of me!

(Sue goes to abortion clinic)

SUE: Take those forceps doc and remove this living, breathing organism, a human being in waiting, of my own flesh and blood, a human being with half my DNA, one that in all likelihood would live to enjoy a full, happy life regardless of the origins of his father, one that will in turn marry and have children, and one that over time will be the progenitor of until thousands more offspring! GET IT OUT OF ME!

(Doctor proceeds to remove unborn fetus with triceps (an actual procedure).)

DOC: There you go, ma'am. The unborn child is now defunct. Yes, I agree, if the poor child had known that his father was a rapist, he certainly would have wanted to be aborted. The child had no future and no right to live, given that his father attacked you. That'll be 99.95, cash or charge? Thanks! Have a nice day.


And when I say "convenience," I mean it.

Putting issues of rape aside, the vast VAST majority of abortions are done, no questions asked. Let's forget, this is a totally legal process. Life isn't sacred, it can be quantified, numericall added and subtracted, and it fits quite conveniently on one's health care bill... (if the Dems get their way.)

Why should she be punished by carrying a child to full term and going through the process of giving birth when she didn't want to get pregnant and had absolutely zero intention of even engaging in behaviour that might possibly warrant a pregnancy in the first place? I can't even imagine the pscyhological effects of the constant reminder of such a horrible experience literally growing inside of me every day for 9 months. Anyways please respond to this ASAP because reading your warped views is entertaining!


FUCKERS! - alien space marine - 5th March 2010

I just had to post thislink


FUCKERS! - A Black Falcon - 5th March 2010

Darunia Wrote:To argue this is the claim that US soliders in Afghanistan are wrong when they kill Taliban insurgents, and poultry farmers are wrong when they provide us with chicken.

This argument is not about all life. It's about abortion.

Abortion is wrong because is impedes, prevents, and kills, a human-in-the-making that would otherwise one day grow to adulthood.

What's the most interesting, though, is how abortion opponents "justify" opposing life and health of the mother exemptions... they seem to believe that it's better for someone to die or be badly hurt (perhaps irreprably) than be saved, because the only way to save them is to give them an abortion.

But it's not like most abortion opponents really care about that, it's only women dying after all and being anti-abortion is nothing if not extremely sexist (yes, some women are anti-abortion. But ever notice how the percentage is dramatically, dramatically lower than it is of men? It's harder for people directly affected by it to be anti-abortion... but it's not like a lot of men care).

Obviously religious reasons play a huge part, but even there I'd think there might be room for at least strong "life and health" exceptions in their horrible anti-abortion laws they keep trying to pass... but no, often not.


And of course, that's not even addressing the fact that if abortion was banned all that happens is it moves to the back alleys again, where the deathrates go way, way up. Considering what I said above about abortion opponents and women, though, obviously they do not care one bit about that.


FUCKERS! - Geno - 5th March 2010

^Not to mention being pro-life apparently ends with birth... unless the person enters a persistent vegetative state (see: Terri Schiavo). Hell, you can even shoot a late-term abortion doctor (in which case he only performed abortions for medical reasons, never for personal reasons) and still call yourself pro-life, because abortion is never justified even if the mother's life is threatened, which would almost always lead to the death of the fetus anyway, but... it's never justified! :cuss:


FUCKERS! - A Black Falcon - 5th March 2010

Exactly, their "logic" makes absolutely no sense.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 5th March 2010

Quote:Why should she be punished by carrying a child

Why should the child be punished by death?

Quote:What's the most interesting, though, is how abortion opponents "justify" opposing life and health of the mother exemptions... they seem to believe that it's better for someone to die or be badly hurt (perhaps irreprably) than be saved, because the only way to save them is to give them an abortion.

Rephrase that. I don't understand what you're saying.

Quote:But it's not like most abortion opponents really care about that, it's only women dying after all and being anti-abortion is nothing if not extremely sexist (yes, some women are anti-abortion. But ever notice how the percentage is dramatically, dramatically lower than it is of men? It's harder for people directly affected by it to be anti-abortion... but it's not like a lot of men care).

Ok up until here this has been a civil argument but if you're going to start making disgusting, untruthful accusations at me I'm going to have to tell you to go fuck yourself.

Quote: Obviously religious reasons play a huge part, but even there I'd think there might be room for at least strong "life and health" exceptions in their horrible anti-abortion laws they keep trying to pass... but no, often not.


Horrible anti-abortion laws. Because any law that prevents women from putting fucking forceps in their vaginas and forcibly removing unborn fetuses is horrible. Who could fucking see anything objectionable to that? Who would ever find anything wrong with pulling a squirming bloody dying fetus from between a woman's legs? What's wrong that that? Only a fool would look at that and find objection to it!


Quote:And of course, that's not even addressing the fact that if abortion was banned all that happens is it moves to the back alleys again, where the deathrates go way, way up. Considering what I said above about abortion opponents and women, though, obviously they do not care one bit about that.

You're putting words in my mouth and I don't appreciate it. You aren't arguing with facts you're arguing with ignorance.

Quote:because abortion is never justified even if the mother's life is threatened


Open your fucking eyes. I've said that is the one instance where I would allow it.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 5th March 2010

In anger, after I just posted the above, I thought I might go on Google and find pictures of aborted fetuses to post here. That ought to get the point across, I thought. But I can't. The pictures I found were so fucking disturbing. I am almost driven to tears looking at them, I can't post them here. All I can say is, I don't know what kind of a warped fucking monster would ever condone it. It is simply evil. Killing unborn children. To you it may just be an idea, or a question of civil liberty, but you have to WRAP YOUR FUCKING SOCIALIST BRAIN around the idea that THIS WOULD BE A LIVING HUMAN BEING JUST LIKE YOU if you'd give it a FUCKING CHANCE TO LIVE. It is a totally indefensible CRIME AGAINST HUMANITY to kill unborn children. But YOU--you defend it 100%. Only in the most strenuous circumstances, when the mother will die, would I ever condone it, but that's not good enough for you. A fucking baby means so little to you. Well, you just hug and kiss your mother the next time you see her for HAVING MORE RESPECT FOR LIFE THAN YOU DO AND NOT ABORTING YOU.

Oh, and here. Peruse this since you get off to it so much.
http://images.google.com/images?hl=en&source=hp&q=aborted%20fetus&cts=1267862016415&aql=&oq=&um=1&ie=UTF-8&sa=N&tab=wi


FUCKERS! - A Black Falcon - 6th March 2010

This argument will go nowhere except to cause continued anger so I don't know how much point there is to continue it for too long, but I will for a little longer at least.

Darunia Wrote:Rephrase that. I don't understand what you're saying.

Abortion foes claim to care about life, and then oppose "life and health" exemptions, proving their hypocrisy.

Geno's point that abortion opponents are usually also national health care opponents is also a very good one, and another case of massive hypocrisy. If they care so much about the health and welfare of the American people, they should be advocates for welfare reform... for single-payer, preferably, because that would actually work. But no, they're somehow opposed to actually giving poor people actual competent health care. They only oppose abortion because of religious missionary zeal ("It's murder!"), not because of much actual real concern for people's welfare.

On that note, yes, the Catholic church does consider birth control murder too, because it ends a potential life, and because they believe that sex should never be for fun but should only ever be done for making children -- because humans are corrupt and evil (the Original Sin, remember), so we cannot be allowed to enjoy it, oh no...

Anyway, that is why the Catholic Church opposes birth control and abortion, and is why we have an anti-abortion movement today. You're not religious, yet it is religion that is behind your entire side's argument pretty much... Oh yeah, and that opposition to birth control has played a key role in the spreading of AIDS and other diseases in Catholic countries, and of the massive, dangerous population explosions in some third world countries, because those attitudes are the exact opposite of what the people in those countries so desperately need... These are not separate issues.

Quote:Ok up until here this has been a civil argument but if you're going to start making disgusting, untruthful accusations at me I'm going to have to tell you to go fuck yourself.

It's not disgusting or untruthful, it's fact. Sexism is a major point behind the pro-choice side, it's very real, and it's one of the most important, most central factors in the debate.

To be short, again, the percentage of men that oppose abortion is much, much, MUCH higher than that of women. As I said, there's a very good reason for that -- women actually know somethign about it because they can have children, so they realize what "abortion is illegal" actually means. Men, however, who don't have to think about it, only think about it in the theoretical way, and don't even pause to consider for a second the actual facts such as I presented there.

That may sound like a different reason from what I said there, but it's actually not. The reason why they're not stopping to consider it is partially because they don't have to, but partially because of sexism that causes them (consciously or not) to think less of women than men. It's not exactly saying anything to say that our society is still pretty sexist, it's an obvious fact. That so many men oppose abortion is just another point on the long list.


... Ever notice how most of the Republican women in the House and Senate support abortion rights of some kind, while almost virtually all (or perhaps all) of the Republican men are opposed? Yeah, there's a reason for that. If those men were women, they wouldn't all be opposed, that's for sure. They'd support women's rights, as many women and liberals do, instead of opposing them, as many conservatives do. But they are not, so oppression continues.

Women are a majority of the American population, hopefully eventually these attitudes will come back to bite the Republicans... here's hoping, anyway. Their anti-minority attitudes sure are, at any rate! Good luck winning Texas in a few decades as its Hispanic population increases if Republicans continue to hyperventilate about how evil Mexicans are... :D

Quote:Horrible anti-abortion laws. Because any law that prevents women from putting fucking forceps in their vaginas and forcibly removing unborn fetuses is horrible. Who could fucking see anything objectionable to that? Who would ever find anything wrong with pulling a squirming bloody dying fetus from between a woman's legs? What's wrong that that? Only a fool would look at that and find objection to it!

The problem is, you're trying to conduct a theological debate here, as of course has been said... the issue of when a life is not an absolute. You seem to say conception. Okay. I described the quite different Catholic position above when I talked about birth control. Pro-choice people would probably generally say that it's at the point where science says that the fetus takes on recognizable characteristics of being a human and not some other species -- that is, at about the first trimester. Most abortion laws say that you can't have an abortion after the first trimester without a good reason; that is, late term abortions are not just done for fun. They are done for people with strict medical necessity. That abortion doctor who was murdered was not doing that just to rid people of their fetuses or something, he was doing it for people who had a really good reason for being there.

Oh yeah, and as always, abortion opponents have absolutely no answer for the point that women are going to ignore anti-abortion law anyway, get them done in secret, and then sometimes die of it. People our age today don't remember what those days were like, but my mom for instance does...

So people like you think that it would be better if women were dying back alleys with no medical care instead of getting the help they need to end their pregnancies. Utterly despicable. I guess the "response" is "well, fewer 'people' overall would die", but you're putting a priority on early fetuses over actual humans, and that's just not right. Those self-righteous anti-abortion people, you are supporting murder too... you just won't admit it.

SO yes, restrict choice. Call it "protecting the innocent" instead of "trying to hold back the advancement of women's rights". I however totally disagree.

Honestly though, overall, because of the whole "MURDER" thing, I can understand why it is such a tough issue... gay marriage I can see going away as a major issue, but abortion... that one won't be so easy, and might never go away as an issue. The whole is it murder/isn't it/when is a fetus a human question is so difficult in so many moral, religious, and social grounds that I'm sure it will be a very difficult question for a long time to come, and for good reasons.

Democrats usually say that abortion should be safe, legal, and rare, and apart from how it's kind of a weak defense of keeping abortion legal, they're pretty much right. Some people getting abortions probably shouldn't be -- they should have been more careful with birth control in the first place. Abortion shouldn't really be a replacement for actual birth control. But it must be legal. And it is a matter of choice; it is not your (or my) body. It's their bodies and their right, and it'll either be legal and regulated or illegal and dangerous. And a first-trimester fetus is not a human being... but honestly, considering that religious reasons (as in conservative Christian opposition) form the primary reasons why people oppose abortion, debate over that latter point isn't even really the focus of the argument, I think, as it probably should be.

On that note, I almost didn't notice it because I wasn't reading every post in the thread, but I did now... your defense of opposing abortion in cases of rape is utterly despicable. Rape is not an act of sex or love, it is an act of violence. The victim is not at fault, the perpetrator is. Understanding that fact, and socially agreeing that people (mostly but not entirely men) who rape are wrong for doing it, and that the victims (mostly but not entirely women) are not at fault for being raped, has been a massive social struggle of the past century. That struggle is still ongoing, but it is kind of amazing when you look back, or at some third world countries today, to see how far we have come... and while allowing abortion in cases of pregnancy after rape is a relatively small part of that, it is an important part for the women inflicted by that particular form of suffering. They've already been tortured enough by the rape itself... forcing them to go through with a pregnancy due to it is just incredibly cruel. You talk about the fetus, but you're ignoring the woman, the person who is actually a full, living human...

Quote:Open your fucking eyes. I've said that is the one instance where I would allow it.

My point there was that anti-abortion laws often do not have such exceptions, and when they are put in it is usually only because they think that there is a slightly higher chance of the thing somehow getting through with the exemption, not because they actually care about saving lives.


FUCKERS! - Fittisize - 6th March 2010

Goddamn ABF your pro-feminist argument just gave me a huge raging boner


FUCKERS! - Fittisize - 6th March 2010

Okay and here's the pictures Darunia was too scared to put up. I hope you don't cry too much when you read this post! (And seriously, "SOCIALIST BRAIN"? Haha, you are such an American)

[Image: malachi-aborted-baby.jpfg]
[Image: int_11WK_01.jpfg]
[Image: aborted_9_week_fetus.jpfg]

OHHHHHHHHHH MY GODDD! THE HUMANITY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! HOW CAN YOU NOT BE DRIVEN TO TEARS BY THIS????!!!

DARUNIA Wrote:Well, you just hug and kiss your mother the next time you see her for HAVING MORE RESPECT FOR LIFE THAN YOU DO AND NOT ABORTING YOU.
Dear Mom: thanks for giving birth to me! I understand that there may have been other options available to you, but you chose to raise me in a loving, nurturing family and you, along with my father, gave me the best upbringing I could have ever hoped for. Thank you! Thanks for being ready for a family when you had me and not a university student who would have had to drop out of school and possibly give up your extremely successful future to raise me (awww, too bad patriarchy!). I shall hug and kiss you for that! As for all the abortions you may (or may not) have had, those were very likely (if they happened) extremely personal and emotional decisions, but I know what you did (or did not do) was the right decision because you're the most intelligent and rational human being I have ever met. You value your status as a person more than your expected role to fulfill as a woman, and for that you continually inspire me. You're much much more than a mother! I never wanted anything more than one other older sibling anyways! K BAI! Thanks for being such an amazing woman who would never let anybody but you decide what do do with your body! MUAH! hugs + kisses. Also thanks for moving to a country and meeting my father and raising me in a nation where abortion laws do not exist and our MDs don't get murdered by zealots.


FUCKERS! - Geno - 6th March 2010

Emotional, aren't we? It's understandable as abortion is disgusting, as is the sight of an aborted fetus. I just think it needs to be stated that nobody (nobody remotely sane, that is) likes abortion. It's a very difficult issue and that's why I don't usually get involved in abortion debates. Some of the remarks I made previously weren't directed at you in particular, Darunia, but rather at the average abortion opponent. Last year, a late term abortion doctor was shot to death at his church by a so-called pro-lifer. I find this hypocritical as he was taking human life, which goes against the cause of abortion opponents. Would it have been remotely justified had the doctor not specialized in late term abortions? Perhaps in some twisted sense, yes. Some might feel justice is being done. However, he only performed late term abortions under extreme circumstances, as we mentioned before: when the mother's life is threatened. In the assassin's mind, however, all abortion is wrong all the time always. Religion likely factored into his mindset, adding irony to the church setting in which the murder took place.

I will agree with Weltall that by the third trimester, the mother should have already decided what she wants to do with the baby. Six months of toting it around is more than enough time to make a final decision. If the mother decides on abortion, she should have it performed as early in her pregnancy as possible. It's obviously a lot harder on a teenage girl, especially if she's a rape victim, and so I understand if she chooses not to spend nine months vomiting and being harshly judged by those around her ("Pregnant?! At her age?! What is this world coming to?!"), not to mention the eventual pain of childbirth.

Abortion is not a birth control substitute. Let's face it: teenagers are the horniest people on Earth and most of them are going to become sexually active before they hit 20 whether they know protection exists or not. That's why I can't understand why so many conservatives are opposed to schools teaching children about condoms and birth control contraceptives. (Again, this seems to be rooted in religious morality as the religious right believes that teenagers should be talked out of having sex out of wedlock altogether. Unfortunately, most choose not to listen.)

For the record, I frown upon sexually active girls who have abortions, especially when they continue to be sexually active afterwards. In my opinion, they should bear the burden, have the child, and put it up for adoption. (Lord knows I don't think they should raise their own children.) Should abortion be forbidden if the conception occurred as a result of consensual, unprotected sex? I'd say yes, but then the girl could easily lie and say that she was raped, that the pill didn't work, that the condom broke, etc.

Believe me, I yearn for a more humane way to deal with these sorts of problems and I understand why abortion is so abhorred. Sometimes, it's just the lesser of two evils. I don't like admitting that, believe me. I hate abortion. I just don't think it should be illegal, that's all.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 6th March 2010

Those aren't the specific pictures I found so abhorrent. But if you can look at them and jest then you are not a human. I know we post a lot of weird, fucked up stuff here, but deformed bloody human fetuses, I don't know, there's no humor in that.


Quote:This argument will go nowhere except to cause continued anger so I don't know how much point there is to continue it for too long, but I will for a little longer at least.

So be it.

Quote:Abortion foes claim to care about life, and then oppose "life and health" exemptions, proving their hypocrisy.

I am going to continue to assume, since this is a two-way dialogue, that you are directing this entirely at me, and that I am your ephemeral abortion foe. Having said that: for the 3rd time, I do not oppose abortin to save the mother's life. That point of yours is defunct.

Quote:Geno's point that abortion opponents are usually also national health care opponents is also a very good one, and another case of massive hypocrisy. If they care so much about the health and welfare of the American people, they should be advocates for welfare reform... for single-payer, preferably, because that would actually work.

Now you're really on a tangent. That's like saying, "If anti-abortion people REALLY like people, they should buy everyone in the world puppies." I have no health insurance myself. But, these are two different arguments. The abortion argument and the health care argument are two different fights. Pick one.


Quote:But no, they're somehow opposed to actually giving poor people actual competent health care. They only oppose abortion because of religious missionary zeal ("It's murder!"), not because of much actual real concern for people's welfare.

It now appears I'm the target of all of your socialist anger.

Quote:They only oppose abortion because of religious missionary zeal ("It's murder!"), not because of much actual real concern for people's welfare.

I'm an atheist. And your assuming that anybody who is anti-abortion is lying and actually has no regard for people's welfare is... so profoundly narrow-minded and dumb that I don't need to refute it an further. You can't make a huge generalization like that unless you are, like I said, profoundly dumb. So, in your case, I'll allow it.


Quote:On that note, yes, the Catholic church does consider birth control murder too, because it ends a potential life, and because they believe that sex should never be for fun but should only ever be done for making children -- because humans are corrupt and evil (the Original Sin, remember), so we cannot be allowed to enjoy it, oh no...

I'm an atheist. Not a Catholic.

Quote:Anyway, that is why the Catholic Church opposes birth control and abortion, and is why we have an anti-abortion movement today. You're not religious, yet it is religion that is behind your entire side's argument pretty much...

If religious people are the only kind of people with an affinity for life, then, so be it.


Quote:Oh yeah, and that opposition to birth control has played a key role in the spreading of AIDS and other diseases in Catholic countries, and of the massive, dangerous population explosions in some third world countries, because those attitudes are the exact opposite of what the people in those countries so desperately need... These are not separate issues.

Yes they are separate issues. And I'm not Catholic and I'm not defending them.


Quote:It's not disgusting or untruthful, it's fact. Sexism is a major point behind the pro-choice side, it's very real, and it's one of the most important, most central factors in the debate.

No argument with the bold statement.

So, it's a fact that I'm a sexist Catholic zealot? The burden of truth lies in the accuser, prove this to me. I think you'll have a hard time with it though.

Quote:To be short, again, the percentage of men that oppose abortion is much, much, MUCH higher than that of women.


If you're going to continue to cite phantom surveys and statistics, you're going to have to start citing them. I haven't cited any (that I can recall,) but if you must, then you must cite them. Otherwise they are all disregarded.

Quote:As I said, there's a very good reason for that -- women actually know somethign about it because they can have children, so they realize what "abortion is illegal" actually means. Men, however, who don't have to think about it, only think about it in the theoretical way, and don't even pause to consider for a second the actual facts such as I presented there.

It's your who aren't pausing to consider the facts here. It's a human life you're flushing away here. For you, it's an idealistic feminist crusade. It's a human life though. You're the one who can't get that through your head.

Quote:That may sound like a different reason from what I said there, but it's actually not. The reason why they're not stopping to consider it is partially because they don't have to, but partially because of sexism that causes them (consciously or not) to think less of women than men. It's not exactly saying anything to say that our society is still pretty sexist, it's an obvious fact. That so many men oppose abortion is just another point on the long list.

You're repeating yourself here, and you need to provide citations and links for these surveys and accusations.

Quote:... Ever notice how most of the Republican women in the House and Senate support abortion rights of some kind, while almost virtually all (or perhaps all) of the Republican men are opposed? Yeah, there's a reason for that. If those men were women, they wouldn't all be opposed, that's for sure. They'd support women's rights, as many women and liberals do, instead of opposing them, as many conservatives do. But they are not, so oppression continues.

I have no idea on the opinions of every member of the GOP on abortion, male or female. I'm amazed that you do. I'd be interested in seeing a factual poll of this. Go get me one, or shut up with your phantom statistics.


Quote:Women are a majority of the American population, hopefully eventually these attitudes will come back to bite the Republicans... here's hoping, anyway. Their anti-minority attitudes sure are, at any rate! Good luck winning Texas in a few decades as its Hispanic population increases if Republicans continue to hyperventilate about how evil Mexicans are...

Commmodore Offtopic again devolves into a general anti-Republican rant. I'm going to side-step this one as it has nothing to do with the argument.

Quote:
Horrible anti-abortion laws. Because any law that prevents women from putting fucking forceps in their vaginas and forcibly removing unborn fetuses is horrible. Who could fucking see anything objectionable to that? Who would ever find anything wrong with pulling a squirming bloody dying fetus from between a woman's legs? What's wrong that that? Only a fool would look at that and find objection to it!


Quote:The problem is, you're trying to conduct a theological debate here, as of course has been said... the issue of when a life is not an absolute.

Haha no, the problem here is that we're on opposite sides of a coin. Theoretical? They said above that semen is 'life'... which surprises me, and I'm not quite sure if I agree or not, but you did at the time. Thus, there's nothing theoretical about the statement: Fetus is human life. You didn't argue it before. That's my claim.

Quote:Oh yeah, and as always, abortion opponents have absolutely no answer for the point that women are going to ignore anti-abortion law anyway, get them done in secret, and then sometimes die of it. People our age today don't remember what those days were like, but my mom for instance does...

Sounds like your mother is a whore. So, to recap your logic: If something is illegal and dangerous, but people do it anyway, then it should not be illegal. So, cocaine should be legal, because people do it in back alleys and die from it occasionally.

Quote:So people like you think that it would be better if women were dying back alleys with no medical care instead of getting the help they need to end their pregnancies.

Nobody is making them get an abortion in the first place.

Quote:Utterly despicable. I guess the "response" is "well, fewer 'people' overall would die", but you're putting a priority on early fetuses over actual humans, and that's just not right.

Nobody is making them get an abortion in the first place.

Quote:Those self-righteous anti-abortion people, you are supporting murder too... you just won't admit it.



Explain.

Quote: restrict choice. Call it "protecting the innocent" instead of "trying to hold back the advancement of women's rights". I however totally disagree.

Honestly though, overall, because of the whole "MURDER" thing, I can understand why it is such a tough issue... gay marriage I can see going away as a major issue, but abortion... that one won't be so easy, and might never go away as an issue. The whole is it murder/isn't it/when is a fetus a human question is so difficult in so many moral, religious, and social grounds that I'm sure it will be a very difficult question for a long time to come, and for good reasons.

Yeppers

Quote: And it is a matter of choice; it is not your (or my) body.

So then prostitution, all manner of drugs and mind-altering substances, self-mutilation, and suicide should be legal too, then. It's their body, afterall.


Quote:On that note, I almost didn't notice it because I wasn't reading every post in the thread, but I did now... your defense of opposing abortion in cases of rape is utterly despicable.

Is your mom available next weekend?


Quote:My point there was that anti-abortion laws often do not have such exceptions, and when they are put in it is usually only because they think that there is a slightly higher chance of the thing somehow getting through with the exemption, not because they actually care about saving lives.

I can disprove that whole last statement right now and here by saying that I am anti-abortion, an atheist, and I care solely about saving lives. That should be abundantly clear by now.

Did I mention I'm an atheist?


FUCKERS! - alien space marine - 6th March 2010

Quote:Sounds like your mother is a whore. So, to recap your logic: If something is illegal and dangerous, but people do it anyway, then it should not be illegal. So, cocaine should be legal, because people do it in back alleys and die from it occasionally.

When someone charges you with being sexists, I dont think the best way to refute that charge is to call someone's mother a harlot..

I am of the opinion that Cocaine and hard drugs shouldn't be illegal, They should have clinics to provide dope to addicts,At the same time keep a census of users and require them to undergo rehab after a period of time, A much better solution then having thousands taking up space in jail, I'd basically make it that only state can distribute narcotics.

Doing so would shrink organized crime significantly along with corruption and gang violence.

Kind of how the blood bath of the mafia was diminished after prohibition of alcohol ended.


FUCKERS! - Geno - 6th March 2010

Much of our arguments aren't directed at you, Darunia, but rather at the anti-abortion crowd in general. We know you're not religious, but the average pro-lifer is. In my opinion, most pro-life people I've known were against abortion for the same reason as you, because it's horrible and disgusting and it involves taking the life of a potential human being. Some will often bring God into the argument, but for the most part, they oppose abortion because they care about the fetus's right to live.

That said, some of the most vocal, outspoken opponents of abortion that I've known have been female. My girlfriend, who's liberal on most issues, is pro-life. I understand perfectly why people choose to be pro-life, whether religion factors into it or not. However, many of them have this idea that pro-choicers are all evil, uncaring, sociopathic devil worshipers and that's simply not true. Like I said before, it's a complicated issue and there is no easy answer, but I feel both sides, for the most part, have good intentions, which is sometimes hard to see. The fact of the matter is that pro-choice people don't like abortion either; they just see it as a necessary right to protect women. At the same time, I don't think sexism has very much to do with why others are pro-life; I believe it has more to do with concern for the fetus and its right to live, and that fetus just so happens to be a parasite on the woman's body.

I don't expect to change anyone's stance on abortion or the rights of women vs. the rights of fetuses, but I would at least like for everyone to understand where the other side is coming from. No one here has picked his side out of hatred or indifference towards anyone. I'm split down the middle, although I admit my support of stem cell research has swayed me in favor of the right to choose, and I support stem cell research out of concern for humanity, not because I enjoy the thought of fetuses being slaughtered.


FUCKERS! - Fittisize - 6th March 2010

Quote:Sounds like your mother is a whore.

Good God, so now a woman who gets an abortion is a "whore"? Why do you hate women so much?


FUCKERS! - Geno - 6th March 2010

Yeah, that is a cheap shot. A woman could have sex one time with one guy and get pregnant. Whores aren't the only ones who end up with unwanted pregnancies.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 6th March 2010

His mother is a whore because I am angry with him.


FUCKERS! - Fittisize - 6th March 2010

Quote:The fact of the matter is that pro-choice people don't like abortion either; they just see it as a necessary right to protect women. At the same time, I don't think sexism has very much to do with why others are pro-life; I believe it has more to do with concern for the fetus and its right to live, and that fetus just so happens to be a parasite on the woman's body.

I think you're right that nobody likes abortion, pro-lifers or pro-choicers (and in fact the pro-choice movement are doing things to raise awareness for safe sex behavior which would prevent the number of unwanted pregnancies, opposite from the pro-life abstinence-only approach which prevents jack shit), but it is indeed very sexist. It's evocative of the gendered idea that women are natural care-givers and mothers, baby-making machines and so on and so forth, and really nothing else. Wanting to do something as shocking as to not want to be a mother is a serious deviation from their natural and expected behaviour as women. Restricting their right to have an abortion is saying that women don't have the capacity to make proper decisions regarding their own bodies. It's just another form of subjugation.


FUCKERS! - Geno - 6th March 2010

Let's put it this way: I don't think anyone who's pro-life is being consciously sexist (and again, I've known some very hardcore pro-life women).

I will definitely agree with you about the abstinence-only movement. This movement is religiously driven and does not help the situation at all. Pregnancy prevention is by far the best answer to the abortion debate if people will get over the whole idea that cumming outside of a vagina is a sin. You can use all the scare tactics about pregnancy and STDs you want, but when two people are horny and attracted to one another, they're going to do it, and so condom and birth control awareness is the best way to prevent an unwanted pregnancy, and by extension, an abortion.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 6th March 2010

I'm getting tired of this. It's dragging on. Bottom line, we all agree that killing babies may, under some circustances, be considered taboo in some circles, while kosher in others. It's constantly five on one here so let's change the topic or close the thread. New topic:

TACO BELL: YAY OR NAY?

Back in my wilder college days I used to eat there all the time, perhaps to the extent that I no longer taste any difference between anything on their menu, and it all just kind of tastes bland and blah and cheap nowadays. Comments.


FUCKERS! - alien space marine - 6th March 2010




FUCKERS! - Darunia - 6th March 2010

*Declares formal state of war on Alien Space Marine*


FUCKERS! - Geno - 6th March 2010

Dude. ASM. Seriously. Gross.

I used to love Taco Bell, but when I worked at Winn-Dixie Supermarkets from 2003 to 2009, I ate at the Taco Bell that was in the same strip mall almost every day and it got to the point where I was so sick of Taco Bell. I went through the same thing Darunia described: everything on their menu tasted bland to me. Now that I rarely eat Taco Bell anymore, I enjoy their food again.


FUCKERS! - alien space marine - 6th March 2010

Geno Wrote:Dude. ASM. Seriously. Gross.

Its fake , It makes fun of myths about the Chinese.

As for Taco Bell , Ive only eaten there maybe 3 times ever in my life and the last time was in California 11 years ago, I still have that stupid Chihuahua's plush doll.


FUCKERS! - A Black Falcon - 6th March 2010

Fittisize Wrote:Good God, so now a woman who gets an abortion is a "whore"? Why do you hate women so much?

My mom hasn't had an abortion, as far as I know. She's been involved in the women's rights movement since the '60s, though, so she most definitely remembers the days when it was illegal, and knew people then who got illegal abortions I'm sure... and so she would know how dangerous it was.

Geno Wrote:Much of our arguments aren't directed at you, Darunia, but rather at the anti-abortion crowd in general. We know you're not religious, but the average pro-lifer is. In my opinion, most pro-life people I've known were against abortion for the same reason as you, because it's horrible and disgusting and it involves taking the life of a potential human being. Some will often bring God into the argument, but for the most part, they oppose abortion because they care about the fetus's right to live.

Absolutely -- my post was not just to Darunia, but to abortion opponents in general. I thought that was pretty clear.

Also, maybe on the second part, but I think that in virtually all cases religion plays a very large role behind it. Just like with opposition to gay rights, religious groups are the central forces behind opposition to abortion. That is, Darunia is an exception to the rule I would say.

Quote:Let's put it this way: I don't think anyone who's pro-life is being consciously sexist (and again, I've known some very hardcore pro-life women).

Some women are opposed to women's rights, though... ever read much of Ann Coulter's stuff?

I do think the sexism is at least semi-conscious. A lot of it does come out of our sexist society, so it's not all freely chosen or something, but I wouldn't completely excuse people because of that... it's a partial explanation, but definitely not a full one.

Oh, as for the Congress stuff and on the issue of women being much more pro-choice than men, Darunia, I know beyond any shadow of a doubt that what I said is true, but it'll take a while to find sources. I will try to do that.

Quote:I will definitely agree with you about the abstinence-only movement. This movement is religiously driven and does not help the situation at all. Pregnancy prevention is by far the best answer to the abortion debate if people will get over the whole idea that cumming outside of a vagina is a sin. You can use all the scare tactics about pregnancy and STDs you want, but when two people are horny and attracted to one another, they're going to do it, and so condom and birth control awareness is the best way to prevent an unwanted pregnancy, and by extension, an abortion.

Studies prove that abstinence-only education completely fails to do anything at all, while teaching birth control works and reduces pregnancy rates. Conservative/religious opposition is very much misplaced and sad, and their efforts to push abstinence have done nothing except raise the teenage birthrate in the US and surely give more people STDs than otherwise would have them.

Fittisize Wrote:I think you're right that nobody likes abortion, pro-lifers or pro-choicers (and in fact the pro-choice movement are doing things to raise awareness for safe sex behavior which would prevent the number of unwanted pregnancies, opposite from the pro-life abstinence-only approach which prevents jack shit), but it is indeed very sexist. It's evocative of the gendered idea that women are natural care-givers and mothers, baby-making machines and so on and so forth, and really nothing else. Wanting to do something as shocking as to not want to be a mother is a serious deviation from their natural and expected behaviour as women. Restricting their right to have an abortion is saying that women don't have the capacity to make proper decisions regarding their own bodies. It's just another form of subjugation.

Well said, I completely agree.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 6th March 2010

/ignores ABF

I don't eat much fast food anymore, really. All I ever have a taste for is thai and indian. Chinese is bland, too, to me, and italian... I've always hated italian food.


FUCKERS! - Geno - 6th March 2010

alien space marine Wrote:Its fake , It makes fun of myths about the Chinese.
We were talking about Taco Bell. Taco Bell is Mexican... er, well, Mexican-based, anyway.

I love Italian and Chinese food. I've never had Indian or Thai food though.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 6th March 2010

He was referring to the pictures of the babies-in-food.

Italian food: 10,000 types of pasta in 500 types of pasta sauce. Period. And I've been to Italy, and I've eaten in Rome, and it sucked there too.

Chinese, at least the Chinese we have around here (if not actually that in China) is better than Italian, but... I don't know, it's all so bland.

Thai and Indian are where it's at: everything is spicy and aromatic. Every meal is an experience.


FUCKERS! - Geno - 7th March 2010

I guess I just like pasta. More than that, though, I like pizza and Italian dressing on my salads. As for Chinese food, there's a really good local restaurant in Montgomery called Ming's Garden. Some of the food is spicy, some of the food is sweet, some of it is sweet and sour, but I wouldn't call any of it bland. It could be a difference in quality between restaurants or just a difference in tastes. (I actually didn't like the Chinese food I had at this one restaurant in Oklahoma. In fact, I once went to a different Chinese restaurant in Montgomery than the one I normally go to, I had shrimp in lobster sauce which sounded delicious, and it was bland as you described... it also gave me really bad diarrhea, which I'm sure you want to know all about.)

Guess I'll have to try Thai and Indian food now.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 7th March 2010

Well everyone likes pizza... it's become the bastardized standard food everywhere, and as such I discount it as Italian.

Wherever I got for Chinese, it all tastes the same... I don't know why. The rice, the lo mein, the "lobster" sauce (yea, right... "lobster")... it just tastes sp processed and blech. I assume it's this way everywhere--everywhere I've had Chinese it's been the exact same. I assume that you favor it, and I hate it, because of a difference in our palettes.


FUCKERS! - A Black Falcon - 7th March 2010

... You've never had Thai? Really... there must be like ten Thai restaurants in this city, maybe more... plus like three in my hometown... but they DO say that this area has some of the highest number of restaurants per capita of anywhere in the country, so I guess not everyone is as lucky as we are to have so many good places to eat around.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 7th March 2010

I had Thai today.

I could not live without Thai and Indian.

Thai and Indian > all other cuisines.


FUCKERS! - lazyfatbum - 8th March 2010

Rice noodles.

Pea pods.

Get the fuck out of here.

When I was in North Dakota I ate a fucking steak from a black angus cow that was killed that morning, it was bloody and had 23 different spices rubbed in to it and soaked in some kind of liquid. It was as thick as my wrist, and the size of a dog it was barely charred on its edges, it was the first time I ejaculated from my mouth. My instincts fully aware, I became man-kind.

I ate the entire thing. Including the bones. And washed it down with homemade beer that was mixed in a bathtub and fermented in 1940's coca-cola bottles. There was mashed potatoes, but I only remember them like a vague thought. They were ignored. There was a salad, like a bad joke that you pretend not to hear. Pickled beets? Laugh. Your homemade bread fresh from the oven oh, maybe but if it takes up room my stomach that could be filled with steak I will forcibly regurgitate it to make sure that only steak will live here. In fact, I will regurgihate. Never mind your buttery top and fluffy perfection and oh, how you soak the steak the juices so lovingly but homemade bread you only get two bites. That is your destiny. This moment is only for the steak, to compliment the steak, to lift the steak up where it belongs. It was an event.

The next day, in the evening, I produced a turd the size of most women, it smelled like shit and steak and beer. I had to wear 3-D glasses, I played Enya and lit a candle, when it finally came out, I felt a bond with it not unlike that of a mother to her child.

When I see a steak I quiver, falling in to a memory of that glorious meal but alas... always disappointed because nothing can compare to that one steak. Cooked for me by a man who worked on a farm, over a pit of fire in the setting sun, his arms were larger than my torso and he had no name... only Brother. My instincts quietly locked away since then, waiting for the chance to grind my teeth against the seared flesh of an animal. His mexican farmhand chose money for his work that day, FOOL. I received the real reward. I had sampled God's menu and tasted His most famous dish. Real meat, perfected... worshiped.

Fuck your cuisine. There is only steak.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 8th March 2010

There is not steak. Then you will realize it is not the spoon that bends; only yourself.


FUCKERS! - Weltall - 8th March 2010

No. Steak is awesome.

The best part about being roommates with Toven for two years was that he is one mother fucker what knows how to grill a steak. It's been over a year since he last made me one, but I can still taste its echoes.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 8th March 2010

Indian food is tasteless spicy diarrhea inducing vomit that gives people ulcers.

That's right I said it.

Now what are you going to do about it.

I'm going to edit your post and call you an asshole.


FUCKERS! - A Black Falcon - 8th March 2010

I don't like or eat beef. Sorry.


FUCKERS! - Weltall - 8th March 2010

Why are you apologizing? It is you who misses out.


FUCKERS! - A Black Falcon - 8th March 2010

I don't think so, I've never liked steak at all. Even back when I did occasionally eat beef (stopped in 12th grade of highschool), it was never something I had eaten much and I never had liked steak. I'd have something else when other people were having steak, even back then.

Similarly, I don't like lamb and don't eat it because it tastes a lot like steak.


FUCKERS! - Darunia - 8th March 2010

Lamb and pork are gross.

Beef is tasty and delicious---but I prefer chicken, when it's well flavored.