![]() |
You know, you wouldn't have to apologize - Printable Version +- Tendo City (https://www.tendocity.net) +-- Forum: Tendo City: Metropolitan District (https://www.tendocity.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Ramble City (https://www.tendocity.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=44) +--- Thread: You know, you wouldn't have to apologize (/showthread.php?tid=5187) |
You know, you wouldn't have to apologize - A Black Falcon - 20th March 2009 if you hadn't say something horrible and wrong in the first place. http://www.cnn.com/2009/LIVING/03/20/obama.special.olympics/index.html You know, you wouldn't have to apologize - EdenMaster - 20th March 2009 Oh grow up. It's not a slur, it's a word that political correctness has deemed too naughty. The other words that article mentions are slurs, specifically created and used to demean a certain group. Up until a few years ago, this word was pretty much a medical term. In some circles, still is. Am I being insensitive? Probably. But political correctness is getting more out of hand now than ever, and it's annoying. Grow up. You know, you wouldn't have to apologize - A Black Falcon - 20th March 2009 "I'm not being insensitive or hating gays when I use the word as an insult! It's just a word, nothing else, really! I just mean it as... um... well... (an insult, because that's what it is, is what they'd say if they were being honest)" Special Olympics are wrong and insulting. Laughing at people because of their mental challenges? That's just cruel... incredibly, incredibly common, but cruel. :( You know, you wouldn't have to apologize - A Black Falcon - 20th March 2009 http://sportsillustrated.cnn.com/2009/more/03/20/obama.special.olympics.ap/index.html Quote:Special Olympics bowling champion challenges Obama to match I agree, it was just a standard, disgusting "mentally retarded people are funny to insult because they're dumb" joke, the kind that you hear way, WAY more often than you should. Why should it be considered okay to make fun of people just because they were born with problems you don't have? It's not their fault! It's cruel... why is there a difference between insulting gays and insulting people with disabilities? If some of the things people say about this issue had been similar insults about gays, or black people, or something like that there'd have been definite controversy... but because we think "that's not as bad", that doesn't happen. It should be considered as bad, and this campaign does good work in showing that. I'll admit that I haven't always thought of "retard" as being quite as bad as those other words, though it clearly is bad and a word to be avoided... I think I do a good job, and would never make a "joke" like that, but I probably should do even better. Oh, and sure, it is part of a medical definition. That would be fine, but the problem is that it's also a mean insult. Would making it socially unacceptable just make the terms, not the meanings, change? Perhaps, but I think we have made progress on these issues in this country over the past decades... we can make progress on this too, even if the low-hanging fruit of making fun of people with mental incapacities isn't one likely to go away. You know, you wouldn't have to apologize - Geno - 30th March 2009 The moral of this story? Presidents shouldn't be comedians. You know, you wouldn't have to apologize - A Black Falcon - 31st March 2009 Yeah, I think that's a good conclusion. You know, you wouldn't have to apologize - Weltall - 2nd April 2009 And here we all thought the age of the presidential malaprop began and ended with W. You know, you wouldn't have to apologize - Geno - 2nd April 2009 Will there be a calendar of Obamaisms, featuring his special olympics remark and his "bitterly clinging to guns and religion" remark? Only time will tell. It depends mainly on whether or not conservative comedy will ever reach a mass level. You know, you wouldn't have to apologize - A Black Falcon - 2nd April 2009 Weltall Wrote:And here we all thought the age of the presidential malaprop began and ended with W. Anybody is capable of saying or doing stupid things. W certainly was worst than most, though, for sure... but this one of Obama's was certainly bad enough to be worth criticizing. You know, you wouldn't have to apologize - Geno - 3rd April 2009 Every president is bound to screw up at some point and make the sort of off color remark that normal people can get away with but presidents can't. It's just that Bush did it all the time unapologetically. Of course, he was unapologetic for everything he did. As the "decider," he knew exactly what the majority of people (in the US and in the world) wanted and instead did things his way. In a true democracy, the people are the deciders. But I digress. I imagine if Bush had made a remark about the special olympics, it would become a Bushism and an internet meme (mainly because remarks about Bush being retarded are about as common as remarks about Paris Hilton being a slut; it'd really be something if Bush, even jokingly, explicitly stated that he's retarded). But it wasn't Bush this time. It was Obama, who has a reputation for being more tactful than this, hence the uproar. |