+- Tendo City (https://www.tendocity.net)
+-- Forum: Tendo City: Metropolitan District (https://www.tendocity.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4)
+--- Forum: Ramble City (https://www.tendocity.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=44)
+--- Thread: The thread o' random thoughts (/showthread.php?tid=4252)
The thread o' random thoughts - Dark Jaguar - 2nd March 2007
I made this thread under the pretense of everyone posting their random thoughts on pointless things, but really it's about this one SPECIFIC musing:
When's the Godzilla vs Paul Bunyan movie coming out?
The thread o' random thoughts - Great Rumbler - 2nd March 2007
What?
The thread o' random thoughts - Darunia - 2nd March 2007
Random, 'eh? Gorons excel at that.
Yesterday, I saw a yellow toast tulip in the Dutch boat cellar outside my door. I said, "Hoy, there, young fella! How goes the scrotum today?" And they all replied in a grande, gay chorus "Lords! Lords! Today is the creamy rabid summer!" And then we all regaled out harshened spirits over a bowl of soupy walnuts.
The thread o' random thoughts - Great Rumbler - 2nd March 2007
I can do better than that with my hands tied around my left earlobe!!
*ahem*
Forsooth! Ever in yonder glade there doth reside my own sweet bumpkin WHO ATE MY WALLET LAST MORROW THAT KNAVE!!! but in all other cases he is indeed a honorable sir, despite the fact that he dotheth prespire heavily when partaking of his picture tube games. All that rubbish aside for the moment, would you care to indulge thine own self in a round of poking the rabbit with a ball of compressed wool? It is ever so habershing!! Or so sayeth those kind sirs who spilt ale all over my counter-top information processing unit! What a noon-tide that was indeed, I must say!! Cheerio and all that ruck! Now I shall, with proper care, handle this posting of rumour on yon internets, so that we may have a plentiful harvest next season!
The thread o' random thoughts - Weltall - 2nd March 2007
and then and then i went over to samuel l (the l stands for LEROY MOTHERFUCKING) jacksons house and we ate crumpets and sipped chianti by the fireplace and i was surprised because will ferrell fell down from the roof and quoted shakespeare tho i don't think he knows all the words because i don't remember deion sanders being in hamlet but thats becuz i faled english class lol neways jackson stood up and said 'motherfucker, motherfucker!' and than the world a'sploded the end
The thread o' random thoughts - alien space marine - 3rd March 2007
Hitler playing the banjo at a concentration camp.
The thread o' random thoughts - Dark Jaguar - 3rd March 2007
Great Rumbler Wrote:What?
Read it again. Don't worry, I'll wait.
Okay, now you CAN'T tell me that wouldn't be just totally awesome! There will be, like, this first fight, but it's like the "they are just meeting each other" fight, only Paul is hungry so he has to run away, except he's a lumberjack, so that is more like he runs OVER Godzilla and it's not really "away" so much as he's after some FLAP JACKS, the source of a lumberjack's power. And godzilla is all like, god of zillas (whatever those are), so he eats an entire sun and then the real battle starts, and I'm pretty sure the battle is so intense that like... the ocean runs away in fear. Oh sure ocean, 70% of the surface eh? Yeah, that's just the SURFACE, we know how small you really are, in terms of VOLUME, yeah off with you! Water SUCKS anyway! Who drinks water?
The thread o' random thoughts - Darunia - 3rd March 2007
Why is is that whenever someone tries to be random, they invariably involve English accents and dialect?
Wobbling wobbergongers bobbled my blinking space hare,
While the stupendous strobelight monkey did me a scare,
What's this all with fuzzy green rhymes, who does care?
Peter, Paul, Fritz McGee, and all the knee socket puppies;
and then the Lord said to Ebenezer, "the words of the prophets are written on the subway walls, and tenement halls, and echoed in the well of silence;" but fools said I do not know, silence like a cancer grows, hear my words that I may teach you, take my arms that I may reach you, but my words like silent raindrops fell, purple dishwasher gravel nuts pie.
The thread o' random thoughts - Great Rumbler - 3rd March 2007
Quote:Why is is that whenever someone tries to be random, they invariably involve English accents and dialect?
Because you asked so nicely:
I've often wondered lately about the fact that my hair seems to have developed something of an intelligent society. With the aid of a mirror, I noticed that not only have they developer mass-transit from the the back of my neck all the way to my chin but they also have psuedo-random citizenship cards with RFID transmittors that the government of Hair uses to keep the common citizens from travelling further than my armpits. Daily I have seen convoys of hairs emigrating from my legs to my arms in a vain attempt to escape from their despotic Lord Zod Emmanuel, a rather unking person who delights in burning other hairs with his cigarettes. Now, all of this wouldn't be that big of a deal, but I think Lord Zod and Emperor Shellic IX and planning to overthrow my eyebrows, which have up to this point maintained a stoic neutrality in an ever-escalating race to conquer various regions of my own body. The eyebrows have a very stable republic which is governed by an elected body who oversees the day-to-day operations of the muscles involved with moving that part of my face. In all other things a vote is held to decide what must be done, as in the case of intense surprise or of deep anger. Invariably, as the citizens of eyebrow set aside very little to their own defense, I fear that they will quickly fall under the heal of Zod and Shellic IX should such an alliance ever come to pass. It is under this assumption that I have taken to routinely shaving parts of my body so as to keep their numbers in check for the time being. However, it seems that most of the hairs have retreated under my skin and there lurk until the razor has passed, only to spring forth again in greater numbers and strength than ever before. It is only a matter of time before the people of eyebrow are overcome by the maliious machinations of those two despots previously mentioned. I can only wait...and hope.
How do you like that, Mr. Darunia?!
The thread o' random thoughts - Darunia - 4th March 2007
My bubblegum sounds like moss.
The thread o' random thoughts - Great Rumbler - 4th March 2007
I can't come to the banana right now because my shoes are in the opossum.
The thread o' random thoughts - Weltall - 4th March 2007
Plums deify.
The thread o' random thoughts - Great Rumbler - 4th March 2007
Spregnut.
The thread o' random thoughts - etoven - 4th March 2007
My cat ate hitler and resumed playing his banjo..
Then later pooped out George Cluney.
EDIT.....
AND buried him in the litter box :)
The thread o' random thoughts - etoven - 4th March 2007
This is about as random as it gets....
<object width="425" height="350"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/nCDIBqVsjek"></param><param name="wmode" value="transparent"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/nCDIBqVsjek" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" wmode="transparent" width="425" height="350"></embed></object>
Ow.. and my dog's ass cheeks are red because he pooped out Saturn during the night of the full penis, which changes everyone into lepricons.
There I said it, and I fell better.
The thread o' random thoughts - alien space marine - 4th March 2007
John Travolta danced away on the litter box stumbled over George Cluney knocking him in the nads , Causing him to fart out Charlie Sheen who he had shoved in his ass by the cat.
John Travolta then dragged Charlie Sheen to the Scientology detox clinic.
The thread o' random thoughts - DMiller - 4th March 2007
That was great Sir Toven. Oh, I need to come up with something random...wait, is it random if I have to think about it? I'm no good at this game.
The thread o' random thoughts - Dark Jaguar - 4th March 2007
The first duty of every Starfleet officer is to the TRUTH!
There are FIVE lights! Well, I'm pretty convinced at this point.
The thread o' random thoughts - Darunia - 9th March 2007
Zany zoological mice felt napkins underneath flashing windows where doctors revel in obstinate nausea.
The thread o' random thoughts - lazyfatbum - 11th March 2007
Fuck women.
The thread o' random thoughts - Dark Jaguar - 12th March 2007
That's just pretty much par for the course with you. Something original perhaps?
The thread o' random thoughts - Weltall - 12th March 2007
Most people here have never done it before.
YEAH, I WENT THERE. :loopy::shake:
:S:evil::crap::love::nodding:The thread o' random thoughts - alien space marine - 12th March 2007
lazyfatbum Wrote:Fuck women.
![[Image: Enjoy_the_view.bmp]](http://eteesandmore.com/store/thumb/vklw/Redneck/Enjoy_the_view.bmp)
Yah there always beastiuality
Or you could go Furry dress up like a lion and bang lady sheep.
The thread o' random thoughts - lazyfatbum - 12th March 2007
I meant fuck them not as in engaging in any sexual activity but as in I wish to remove them completely from my life. They're raised from day one to become self-destructive liches that use emotions as weapons. They never apologize for anything, they never take any responsibility for anything they do and lie to get out of anything. they're frightened, vile, emotionally stunted monsters. And nothing you do to take any steps to help them or confront them with the issues will accomplish anything - it just pushes them away more. All they understand, their entire way of life, revolves around using people and comparing themselves and others to their ridiculous ideas of security, or total lack there of, all because they cant actually think for themselves.
Fuck women.
The thread o' random thoughts - Dark Jaguar - 12th March 2007
So basically they are just like all humans? :D
No, I get ya. You base this highly scientific conclusion on a single relationship, because as we all know anecdote is the plural of evidence.
Basically what I'm saying is you're wrong and the presence of not one but two X chromosomes does not lead naturally to that sort of behavior. Why not all... what country is she from? What not all whatever race she is of. Why not all... whatever her eye color is. Why did "women" become your hated group of choice? My guess is you just picked the trait that stood out most, outside of whatever was done to wrong you, and illogically associated it with that behavior.
But don't worry, it happens allll the time. That's how glass ceilings get built, or internment camps get started.
The thread o' random thoughts - lazyfatbum - 12th March 2007
I have met and talked to hundreds if not thousands of women, they all fit the above. Dont let pink hair, a tattoo, a convincing story or a false front make you think otherwise. If the girl thinks you've caught on to the hidden structure of women they can adapt and convince you if you let them.
The housewife with 2.5 kids and a loving husband, the semi-goth pothead who colors her hair with shoe polish, the 13 year old gymnast who visits dad on the weekends, the 40 year aerobics instructor who's been a lesbian for the past 6 years, the micro-managing business woman who married a lawyer and sleeps with the dentist and the 20 year old high school drop out actress at the denny's, every girl that i've ever known in every relationship with a man i've ever known all fit snuggly in the above. Every one here who's been in a serious relationship (ie: not highschool and longer than 5 years) knows exactly what i'm talking about whether they want to admit to it or not.
When you actually get in to a relationship with someone who isn't presented as half rabbit or whatever it is you masturbate to inbetween mental projections of flogging yourself for the gay thoughts you might have had then you'll have some kind of understanding of what i'm talking about, it also helps if you have some psychology background and some of the common bread and butter.
Show me one woman that doesn't match the above and i'll show you a nun, a retard, a relationship that lasted less than a year before she died/became a nun/retard/broke up (usually for the reasons above) or that she was born a man. And the sad part is you wont comprehend it until you've dealt with it.
The thread o' random thoughts - A Black Falcon - 12th March 2007
Quote:So basically they are just like all humans?
No, I get ya. You base this highly scientific conclusion on a single relationship, because as we all know anecdote is the plural of evidence.
Basically what I'm saying is you're wrong and the presence of not one but two X chromosomes does not lead naturally to that sort of behavior. Why not all... what country is she from? What not all whatever race she is of. Why not all... whatever her eye color is. Why did "women" become your hated group of choice? My guess is you just picked the trait that stood out most, outside of whatever was done to wrong you, and illogically associated it with that behavior.
But don't worry, it happens allll the time. That's how glass ceilings get built, or internment camps get started.
All people say that people in groups other than their own are weird and different, and from their perspectives that is true... whether that is objectively true is a lot harder to determine, though, but more often than not the answer is 'no'.
As you say, Lazy's posts are obviously statements made in unhappiness considering his situation. Are things really like that? No, of course not... if nothing else, that implies that men are just passive observers or something, while actually of course both people are involved in any relationship (and, usually, its breakdown). I don't know any numbers of course but I would certainly expect that men and women are equally responsible for relationship breakdowns overall...
Quote:They never apologize for anything, they never take any responsibility for anything they do and lie to get out of anything. they're frightened, vile, emotionally stunted monsters.
Except for this part, of course, which has no truth to it. (Not that no one is like that, some are I'm sure, but that's something that varies from person to person and has nothing to do with gender.)
The thread o' random thoughts - Weltall - 12th March 2007
I've come across a lot of men who are just as bad with all of those things as any woman.
Illogical, hurtful, and malicious behavior is not exclusive to any of humanity's subdivisions.
The thread o' random thoughts - A Black Falcon - 12th March 2007
Quote:I've come across a lot of men who are just as bad with all of those things as any woman.
Illogical, hurtful, and malicious behavior is not exclusive to any of humanity's subdivisions.
The other gender just gets the blame because heterosexual people aren't trying to have relationships (or analyze them as much) with people of their same sex... so like with any societal division 'it's all people of the other group who are weird and wrong' because people do not spend anywhere near as much time analyzing their own group as they do the others.
The thread o' random thoughts - Fittisize - 13th March 2007
I agree with lazy's posts to an extent - a huge amount of women in my personal experience act exactly the way in which he described. Be it with women that I've been involved with or ones I've observed - I know what you're talking about, even if it's impossible for me to understand according to your criteria (I've only been out of high school for 8 months).
All women have the ability to cheat and lie and be hurtful. I've had more than a few female friends who've cheated on their boyfriends for no other reason aside from the fact that they are apparently manipulative whores, and then lied about it. Some of the best people I've met in my entire life have had their entire world turned upside down because a girl they were with constantly fucked with them. How many relationships have you seen follow this pattern?
Guy meets Girl
Guy likes Girl
Girl does not like Guy
Girl likes OtherGuy
OtherGuy does not like Girl
Girl dates Guy on rebound
Guy falls in love
Girl does not fall in love; says she does anyways
Girl still has feelings for OtherGuy, fucks him
Girl continues to date Guy while continually being dishonest to him
Girl dumps Guy for retarded reason; Guy is heartbroken
On the other hand though, I have come across just as many men who are disrespectful, lying, cheating bastards with little to no regard for a girl's feelings. In fact, I have been one of these people in the past so I know first-hand that men are just as capable of ruining someone's perspective of the opposite sex as women are. Admittedly though, my experiences with women have all been with ones twenty years and younger, with nothing even close to “serious” as lazy described it (maybe for high school and recently out-of-high-school standards they are - but I’ve come to the conclusion that high school relationships are about the stupidest things that anybody could enter). Whatever, I still have an idea as to what lazy is talking about, and I’m sure when I’m a bit older and wiser I’ll still be seeing the exact same things I’m seeing today.
The thread o' random thoughts - alien space marine - 13th March 2007
Anyone who watches discovery channel knows pretty much all species except tape worms are not completely celibate, cheating on the side and multiple partners is part of biological evolution observed in all species and even sexual orientations. Given that I doubt Lazy that you or your "ex wife are any different , If gays were any better why is there gay divorce in Canada and Holland?
You see ancients and "modern Islamic" cultures try to curve this with stonings floggings lots of crushing! See aljeezera or the bible. But in the end I know you would not be happy in a morally chaste theocracy where you would be whipped for looking at porn or talking to any women who waist your mother or relative.
So Mr Fatbum time to get off your ass , tell yourself constantly "she will not get the best of me"! That you are entitled to be a happy person and she is the one who is the loser missing out for her lust.
Learn a new skill play the fiddle and get merry!
I biggest suggestion if you ever start over is find someone who has experienced the same situation as you just reverse.
The thread o' random thoughts - Sacred Jellybean - 13th March 2007
"... don't wait for the good woman. She doesn't exist. There are women who can make you feel more with their bodies and their souls but these are the exact women who will turn the knife into you right in front of the crowd. Of course, I expect this, but the knife still cuts. The female loves to play man against man, and if she is in a position to do it there is not one who will not resist. The male, for all his bravado and exploration, is the loyal one, the one who generally feels love. The female is skilled at betrayal. and torture and damnation. Never envy a man his lady. Behind it all lays a living hell."
-Charles Bukowski
On the other side of the coin:
"The male is completely egocentric, trapped inside himself, incapable of empathizing or identifying with others, or love, friendship, affection of tenderness. He is a completely isolated unit, incapable of rapport with anyone. His responses are entirely visceral, not cerebral; his intelligence is a mere tool in the services of his drives and needs; he is incapable of mental passion, mental interaction; he can't relate to anything other than his own physical sensations. He is a half-dead, unresponsive lump, incapable of giving or receiving pleasure or happiness; consequently, he is at best an utter bore, an inoffensive blob, since only those capable of absorption in others can be charming. He is trapped in a twilight zone halfway between humans and apes, and is far worse off than the apes because, unlike the apes, he is capable of a large array of negative feelings -- hate, jealousy, contempt, disgust, guilt, shame, doubt -- and moreover, he is aware of what he is and what he isn't.
Although completely physical, the male is unfit even for stud service. Even assuming mechanical proficiency, which few men have, he is, first of all, incapable of zestfully, lustfully, tearing off a piece, but instead is eaten up with guilt, shame, fear and insecurity, feelings rooted in male nature, which the most enlightened training can only minimize; second, the physical feeling he attains is next to nothing; and third, he is not empathizing with his partner, but is obsessed with how he's doing, turning in an A performance, doing a good plumbing job. To call a man an animal is to flatter him; he's a machine, a walking dildo."
-Valerie Solanas, from the SCUM Manifesto
I'm in the boat that both sexes are flawed equally (in similar and different ways), and that humanity itself is flawed.
The thread o' random thoughts - alien space marine - 13th March 2007
Didn't that Valeria Feminazi chick murder a famous Brooklyn pop artist in his apartment? I think this Solanas had actually envision genocide on the opposite gender.
"As for a walking adjustable love machine synthetic man for women I believe its been made in California by some engineers" *men*.
I once went into the opposite sex is evil binge instigated by folks like miss Valerie .
The thread o' random thoughts - lazyfatbum - 13th March 2007
I've met guys that are total assholes, and I dont mean in the sexy way. Guys that are married but pick up girls like they're single, constantly trying to reaffirm their ego as if getting attention from the girls feeds their insecurities. An insecure man is a dangerous ideal. If left to their own devices they'll burn every bridge and break every link of trust just to get to the bottom of the reasonings (percieved anyway) of their insecurities. But as men, we're litteral and logical, and much to women's disappointment we can immediately ferret out bullshit though we may not be able to pinpoint it - we know when it's happening.
If a woman looks down on her self and has security issues, there is absolutely nothing a man can say to help them. Nothing we do in the relationship will aid them in giving them security or help them look up to themselves - they have to do it for themselves which is where the destructive nature resides. With men, you can be insecure and look down on yourself, but if we're treated good by a woman and see them back up their claim that they look up to us, our insecurities melt away. But it works in the inverse too. If a woman makes any statement that might bolster the male's insecurity he'll grab on to it and use it to anchor himself firmly in that insecurity.
If you're say, worried that you're too short, and your girl brings up that you're short and it dissapoints her, the man is going to be in the negative on the emotional scale. He'll take the past insecurities and multiply them - making them even more important to his well being. He'll buy elevators for his shoes, wear boots with 3 inch heels, learn about backbone stretching, walk as erect as possible and try to undo the insecurity by removing its cause. If after trying so hard (at this stage the male usually feels pretty good about themselves though are stressed out by it) the girl is still disappointed or looks down it still, then she has effectively broken that man. He'll succumb to every negative feeling he has about himself. He'll still take every measure to appear taller, but that insecurity will completely devour him, affecting him in every aspect of life.
After years of that, when that man meets a woman who says "Oh I dont think you're short at all." the male's world is turned upside down. This is where a man finds out if he's a man or not - he's with a girl and for better or worse he owes his heart to her. If he cheats on her with this girl just for the ideal of being less insecure he'll ruin everything. It's a major test. Unfortunately for a lot of men, the simple musings of a girl are allowed to be devastating to them, allowing it to crush them. But it comes in two flavors:
If the girl says she's disappointed in that your short and distances herself from you, physically and emotionally, starts looking at tall guys and telling you about tall guys she met, then its solidified and ultimately destructive. But if she's as close as ever to you physically and emotionally and has no desire to be with anyone else, she can tell you that you're a midget and it's basically okay because there's no threat of losing her because of it. These are the couples who can openly say anything, couples where the man can tell his girl she's gained weight, the girl can tell the guy he's too bald, etc etc. And because of the closeness in the relationship those ideas aren't made important and cant become destructive. It's only when the negative opinions and views affect the closeness of the relationship that it actually causes any negative outcome, the rest is just cannon fodder.
For a girl, its far less cerebral and has more to do with appearance based on whatever her upbringing was. That's about 40% of the idea. The rest comes from a dynamic emotional aspect that is without question the most destructive and can change her entire personality in an instant and nothing is based on anything logical. Without bringing it up or talking about it, a girl who's never had any interest in say, a man who's intelligent or articulate, will exclusively become attracted to that IF the man she's with isn't intelligent or articulate. The grass is always greener mentality affects every thought they have and its used to, in their view, better themselves. An example would be an older woman who's been with a guy for several years and is happy. The husband is also older, and with that comes the obvious effects of getting older. And without talking about it to the man or bringing it up in any way, the woman will reach a conclusion that she's more attracted to younger guys and in time, it will effect her so much that eventually the relationship will be destroyed. Then, after its destruction when the woman realizes that she put ridiculous ideals in her head that actually came from her own personal fear of growing older, she'll hate herself, become more emotionally unstable and do one of two things; beg the man to take her back or run like hell.
In any given situation in a couple's counseling office you see the same thing over and over. The guy says she suddenly changed, became this other person, her personality did a 180. She used to hate guys who were X or X music, or X ideals, and now its like that's all she wants, I dont know who she is anymore. And the woman says the same thing every time, projecting her own thoughts on to him 'He doesn't understand me." Which actually means she doesn't understand her own behavior and cant explain it.
Women will decide that whatever the opposite is, is better. Women who have dated the types of guys who hang out at the beach, surf, have great bodies etc exclusively, will slowly start to lean towards the idea of being with a more effeminate male, suddenly for these women, no one is cuter than a less macho and artistic 'introvert' personality. If a woman who had been exclusively with less macho and introvert personalities, she'll suddenly (even in the middle of a relationship) decide she wants the guys who hang out at the beach. And the change in direction never lasts. They keep bouncing from type to type because they have no idea what they want - only what they percieve to want at that particular instant which, if thought upon and dissected, would become utterly ridiculous to the woman, confusing her, causing her to hate herself, etc. There's no way out of this, everything the man does will be destructive no matter the intentions and it's entirely because women are frightened, vile, emotionally stunted monsters.
The thread o' random thoughts - Sacred Jellybean - 13th March 2007
Quote:Didn't that Valeria Feminazi chick murder a famous Brooklyn pop artist in his apartment? I think this Solanas had actually envision genocide on the opposite gender.
Yeah, she did, and she did. The pop artist was Andy Warhol (made into a movie called "I Shot Andy Warhol"), and the SCUM manifesto talks about how men ought to be exterminated (aside from the few who know their place and dedicate their lives to the servitude of women) and women left to rule the earth with the aid of automation. She was obviously insane, but her manifesto is entertaining to read for laughs.
Lazy: IMO, it's a human trait to always be striving for better living conditions and that the grass is always greener; unhappiness with your partner will most certainly exacerbate this. Perhaps it's slightly worse with women, as they're generally more emotional and prone to requirer higher maintenance than men, but both sexes suffer from it. Not all couples cheat on each other or are unhappy in general. Character is built as maturity grows, and I think that young people (let's say, under 30-35) are more prone to the erratic behavior that you're suggesting.
The thread o' random thoughts - alien space marine - 13th March 2007
You forget she is young naive inexperienced , Teenage girls dont make long lasting partners as they will always have a lingering feeling of missing out having never explored things before marriage unlike what their so called freinds are doing
The thread o' random thoughts - lazyfatbum - 13th March 2007
But that's always the case, you could have a woman, never been married, 45, has 'weekend boyfriends', very well off in the experience department let's call her Slutina. She gets married at 46 deciding to settle down, happy for 5 years, and suddenly she's masturbating to ideas of other men, seeing and meeting men who offer some slightly different type she hadn't experienced before (or just walks in to the grass is greener mentality), and then you're on Cheaters walking in on Slutina and the 17 year old pool boy who once posed for Levi's Jeans asking her WTF happened.
Women will ALWAYS, under ANY CIRCUMSTANCE, have wondering eyes. A man (read: not a boy) can actually settle down and be with a woman his entire life and never think of other women. A woman can be completely in love with someone, so in love her brain implodes whenever she thinks of him, and she'll STILL think well what if I was with him, or him, or him, or her, etc. Because they can never think for themselves, not ever. It's why women make horrible managers - they can never decide on something, stick to it, and accept the responsibility of it. It's always 'oh it got difficult' and drops it like its hot or blames someone else. They do it with relationships, they do it with their education, they do it with every aspect of their life. Inexperience is not an excuse to do that, or have it as some reason of why the girl cheated or why she thought of other men. She did those things because she's a cunt plain and simple; There comes a point where blaming mom and dad or circumstance just becomes a scapegoat for them to take when it's time to jump ship so they dont have to face themselves in the mirror and say hey waitaminute I suck ass.
Do you know why breakups happen? Why divorce happens? It's the same story everytime:
1.) Woman gives up on relationship, doesnt tell husband.
2.) Woman takes conscious steps to cause husband to hate her, litteraly doing things to piss him off to cause him to get angry and to use this as a segwey in to breaking up.
3.) The man keeps trying, thinking that there's an actual problem or issue at hand and not realizing its her ploy to end the relationship.
4.) Woman continues to push buttons.
5.) Man finally gives up out of frustration and anger, gets a divorce/breaks up and is confused for the next 5 years until their Brain Balls drop.
6.) Woman goes off to complete her motive (read: sex with other people and/or running away from herself) and after 10 years or so calls up exhusband for coffee.
Fuck Women.
The thread o' random thoughts - A Black Falcon - 13th March 2007
Women more likely to cheat? I very much doubt that, to say the least. I'm sure that that's an equal thing true evenly to people of both genders... as I said earlier, you just notice it more in women because as a heterosexual man you naturally wouldn't think as much about how men treat women in their relationship as how women in their relationship. That doesn't mean that the percieved imbalance has any validity in fact, though...
Historically, (to go mostly off topic) men have been encouraged to not be faithful to one woman, while the opposite was true for women; from ancient times in most places in the West laws made it very hard for a woman to get a divorce, or for a husband to be punished for cheating; in fact, it was often encouraged (while out on military campaigns or whatever men weren't expected to remain celebate while their wives at home were). On the other hand, women were expected to remain faithful, no matter how long their husbands were gone... think of the Odyssey, where Penelope is faithful for 20 years while Odysseus goes around on his wanderings, at some points sleeping with other women, and both are portrayed as moral. Of course, sometimes the "women are less rational" argument did spill over into "women can't be trusted with anything, including being faithful", but I'd take that as pure mysoginy (hey, as Medieval thought relating to gender, could it be anything else?).
Of course, many Medieval thinkers also justified semi-consentual or nonconsentual sex with lower-class women by saying that peasants couldn't possibly understand romantic love anyway so they wouldn't know the difference between consentual and semiconsental or nonconsentual sex, but that's somewhat unrelated (and besides, even if they did think it was potentially wrong, no lord would ever be prosecuted for anything they did to a peasant...). While things like that have not survived the ages, other stereotypes have...
Of course, things are different now, and laws are equal, because we know better than people did then. Oh, every belief has some basis in truth, in some way or another... men and women are obviously different. Men used the "emotional, unstable" argument to argue for why women shouldn't have political rights for a very long time; now we know, of course, that such things are minor in comparison to the similarities, and now the stereotypes go both ways... is that progress? Erm... I don't know... but it doesn't seem so to me. Of course, since we still don't know exactly what the differences are between the genders are, really, there is plenty of room for people to say "see this difference in understanding emotions or whatever means X Y and Z", but without proof I look at all of it very skeptically. I tend to believe, really, that people are more similar than they think, for the most part...
That doesn't help at all when someone cheats in a relationship of course, but blaming the whole other gender (and, yes, as SJ showed it's just as common in women (blaming men for everything that goes wrong in relationships) as it is in men), while understandable, just isn't true.
The thread o' random thoughts - alien space marine - 13th March 2007
I hope thats not how you percieve yourself in the future , because quite frankly Lazyfatbum you are a fucking a cry baby! You should be lucky you can share a coffee with slutina 10 years down the road when her rump gives way.
Not everyone due to many reasons even have girlfreinds or wives to complain about, Infact such a thing would be a welcome change from the usual drugery regardless of possible outcomes. Infact their greatest concern is being alone involuntarily celibate birthday after birthday with few freinds locked away in a apartment fearing that since 5 years have gone unchanged the next 5-10 could be simular, Untill they fade away into oblivion with just faint memmories of opportunities put to waste years back due to false religious creeds that chastise thy self.
Quote: Marcus Aurelius Quotes
It is not death that a man should fear, but he should fear never beginning to live.
Live not one's life as though one had a thousand years, but live each day as the last.
The universe is change; our life is what our thoughts make it.
See lazyfatbum you and I have been commanded by the ghost of Caesar Marcus Aurelius and Adam Sandler to think happy thoughts.
The thread o' random thoughts - Weltall - 13th March 2007
Sean, I know how intelligent you are, and that's why I know eventually you're going to look back at all this and realize that your emotions were making you say things that are very narrow and obviously skewed. You pride yourself on your logical capacity, so how can you type these things with a straight face?
As I stated earlier, rotten behavior in people knows no arbitrary boundaries such as gender or skin color or food preference. Females are no more likely than males to treat someone who loves them like shit on their shoes. I've seen guys do it, and sometimes even brag about it afterwards.
People are assholes.
The thread o' random thoughts - Dark Jaguar - 14th March 2007
These two are Want and Ignorance. Fear them both but fear the latter more!
The thread o' random thoughts - Weltall - 14th March 2007
Who went and changed the spelling of Philociraptor?
The thread o' random thoughts - Dark Jaguar - 14th March 2007
Twasn't I.
The thread o' random thoughts - Sacred Jellybean - 14th March 2007
I don't have Admin privileges, so you can rule me out.
Who came up with Philociraptor to begin with? "Clever girl...!"
The thread o' random thoughts - Dark Jaguar - 14th March 2007
Maybe it was the genetically engineered dino fighting force from Jurrasic Park 4: The Suckening?
The thread o' random thoughts - lazyfatbum - 15th March 2007
With Bill Murray as Sergeant Annie and guest staring Jack Nicholson as the ejaculating Dilophosaurus.
"Wait'll they get a load from me."
Directed by Peter Jackson's Niece.
The thread o' random thoughts - Dark Jaguar - 15th March 2007
That's more like the lazy I know! I knew you wouldn't fall into some stereotypical trap like so many myspace pages of yore.
You will learn to trust again, you will LOVE AGAIN! Go, and be happy!
*camera pans up to the sun rising on a new day, fading out to the credits, with music by Japanese pop band Rap-Up, showing scenes of various tendites wandering through the town, and lazy staring into a starry night as cherry blossoms flutter around*