![]() |
The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - Printable Version +- Tendo City (https://www.tendocity.net) +-- Forum: Tendo City: Metropolitan District (https://www.tendocity.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Tendo City (https://www.tendocity.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=42) +--- Thread: The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread (/showthread.php?tid=2367) Pages:
1
2
|
The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 14th November 2004 It's coming out this week! WOO!!! Believe it or not I'm actually slightly more anxious to play MGS3 than MP2 right now, mainly because MGS3 will be a newer experience. And I can't wait to see where they take the story. Who else is getting it this week? Here are some jaw-dropping screens to help with the short wait: ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - Private Hudson - 15th November 2004 Curses to my eternal PAL existence. I don't even know when I'll be receiving the game. And unfortunately for you, seems like you may have to wait until then to have a discussion about it on these forums. :D And it's hard to believe that those are PS2 screens. Though, it has definately improved, I dare say that it only looks so strikingly better than #2 due to the more vibrant colours, over the drab browns and greys. The shadows manage to look even better.. even natural. It's very hard to make light/shadows from a tree canopy look real. Perhaps they've been playing a lot of ICO? Can't wait. Let me know when you get it. *so excited* The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 16th November 2004 Weird, it didn't show that you replied here on the MCD page. I had to go into this thread intent on complaining that nobody else liked Metal Gear to see that you posted. :D Quote:Curses to my eternal PAL existence. I don't even know when I'll be receiving the game. I've heard March and even July. ![]() Quote:And unfortunately for you, seems like you may have to wait until then to have a discussion about it on these forums. Man I know. Everyone else here is dumb for not being excited about this game. Quote:And it's hard to believe that those are PS2 screens. Though, it has definately improved, I dare say that it only looks so strikingly better than #2 due to the more vibrant colours, over the drab browns and greys. The shadows manage to look even better.. even natural. It's very hard to make light/shadows from a tree canopy look real. Perhaps they've been playing a lot of ICO? Well the resolution won't be that on the your tv screen and there probably won't be as good anti-aliasing, but yes indeed it looks gorgeous. Aah, two more days!! The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - Great Rumbler - 16th November 2004 I'm hoping to get MGS3 for Christmas, since it's unlikely I'll be able to get it before then. Not impossible though... The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 16th November 2004 I might not be able to afford a DS this week because I want to get Echoes and MGS3. Echoes and MGS3: *are better than a DS* The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - Great Rumbler - 16th November 2004 DS, Feel the Magic, and Echoes: *are better than MGS3* The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 16th November 2004 Echoes and MGS3: *ten times better than a DS and XX/XY and Mario 64* *also less than half the total cost* The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - Great Rumbler - 16th November 2004 It isn't if you exploited the system and traded in DVDs you bought for $3 for $8, per DVD, in Blockbuster store credit to get said handheld and game. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 16th November 2004 It'll look closer to that if you have an HDTV and high quality cables... :) The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - alien space marine - 16th November 2004 The PS2 can have some guts if they actually use it. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 17th November 2004 Great Rumbler Wrote:It isn't if you exploited the system and traded in DVDs you bought for $3 for $8, per DVD, in Blockbuster store credit to get said handheld and game. You could have traded it in for MGS3 and Echoes though... The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - Great Rumbler - 17th November 2004 Or I could trade it in for a DS, a DS game, and then buy Echoes...which is what I'm doing. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 17th November 2004 http://www.gamespot.com/ps2/action/metalgearsolid3/review.html Solid review at Gamespot. Not as good a score as MP2, though... :) The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 17th November 2004 I haven't read the review yet, but I heard about the score and it really makes me chuckle. Halo 2 gets a 9.6 or something and MGS3 gets an 8.8? Those guys are so laughable. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 17th November 2004 Great Rumbler Wrote:Or I could trade it in for a DS, a DS game, and then buy Echoes...which is what I'm doing. ... but Echoes & MGS3 >>>DS and Echoes And a fraction of the cost. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 17th November 2004 8.7. And the review is well done, I would say... from a standpoint of the writing... The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 17th November 2004 Again... quality of writing does not prevent a review from sucking. If the opinion is retarded then Mark Twain himself couldn't prevent it from being retarded. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 17th November 2004 Yes, I absolutely agree that you are fully qualified to say that about this review without having read it. Yup. Uh-huh. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 17th November 2004 Judging by 99% of their past reviews, I'm pretty confident that when I read it it's going to be just as idiotic as it always is. And let me guess: Greg Kasavin was the reviewer, right? The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 17th November 2004 Yeah. He's one of their top editors so he gets a lot of the big games... not that I complain about that... And it really is a positive review. The main complaints are probably about gameplay... how MGS3 plays the same as MGS2 instead of changing to keep up with other action or stealth games. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - Great Rumbler - 17th November 2004 Quote:but Echoes & MGS3 >>>DS and Echoes BUT: Echoes, DS, Feel the Magic, and Mario 64 >>> Echoes and MGS3 The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - Private Hudson - 17th November 2004 Well.. I can just picture TeamXBox "HE GAVE IT A TENTH OF A POINT HIGHER THAN SPLINTER CELL! BIASED! BIASED!" 8.7 is a good score from him. Though, if he complains about it not being more like current games (aka Splinter Cell), then that's a complaint I can live with. I much preferred MGS2's gameplay. And with all the major additions that have been included to the gameplay this time around, I can't wait! The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - Great Rumbler - 17th November 2004 Quote:I much preferred MGS2's gameplay. I did too, though I never played Splinter Cell very much. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 18th November 2004 Quote:Yeah. He's one of their top editors so he gets a lot of the big games... not that I complain about that... HA! How did I know that it was him? And could you post the written review? Because if what you're saying is true then Kasavin made a complete lie. MGS3 adds more to the MG formula than MGS2 did to MGS1. Quote:BUT: Echoes, DS, Feel the Magic, and Mario 64 >>> Echoes and MGS3 Yeah let's see which one's better! Echoes, DS, Feel the Magic, Mario 64 = $260 Echoes and MGS3 = $100. Now which one's the better deal, huh??!! HUH!!!! The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 18th November 2004 You can't read it yourself? ... you're at work and they've blocked Gamespot? The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - Great Rumbler - 18th November 2004 Quote:Yeah let's see which one's better! I'm not going by COST, I'm going by VALUE. *OB1 is teh pwneded* The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 18th November 2004 Value often does include cost, you know... The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 18th November 2004 Quote:8.7 great Quote:Snake is in for another richly cinematic, occasionally convoluted, and ultimately satisfying adventure in Metal Gear Solid 3: Snake Eater, the latest installment in Konami designer Hideo Kojima's long-running stealth action series. Much like its predecessors, Metal Gear Solid 3 begs to be talked about, if nothing else. After all, during the course of the game, you'll experience a story dense with detail and intrigue, one that's often presented using some of the most dramatically staged video game cutscenes to date. You'll also spend about half your time with the game just watching (or listening to) the story unfold, and for every sequence that's extremely exciting and thought-provoking, there's a part that seems needlessly drawn out. Meanwhile, the gameplay itself--despite an all-new setting in a Soviet jungle during the 1960s--really hasn't changed much since the last installment, and it's aged noticeably during these past few years. Consequently, the mechanics of Metal Gear Solid 3 can be just as confounding as the storyline--but also just as rewarding, especially once you reach some of the game's memorable, dramatic confrontations. In short, this is a great game that embodies both the impressive style and the one-of-a-kind spirit of its predecessors. Quote:The story takes place in the wake of the Cuban missile crisis, and involves Snake's attempts to rescue a brilliant Russian weapons specialist--someone who's developed a machine so dangerous that it could disrupt the Cold War standoff between the United States and the Soviet Union, and shift the balance of power squarely into the hands of people like Colonel Volgin. Snake's mission is ostensibly to rescue the scientist, but if you've played previous Metal Gear Solids, then you'll rightly expect that his mission won't be so cut-and-dried. At any rate, Snake's encounters behind enemy lines will take him through everything from dense jungles, leech-infested swamps, and quicksand to heavily guarded military complexes. The game's setting is cohesive and believable, and it offers a good amount of variety and plenty of tactical opportunity. In the jungle, Snake is forced to be a survivalist and use the environment to his advantage. This leads to the game's new elements of play. Quote:Snake can hoard a ton of food in his backpack, to the point where it seems like he's carrying around a zoo instead of just enough food to stay alive. While it's pretty fun to experiment with eating all the different types of plants and animals you can find, if only to hear Snake's reactions at having to sample each of them, the food system ultimately isn't a big deal--it's easy to find enough food to keep your stamina gauge nice and high at all times. If you let it dwindle, your healing rate will slow down and your aim will grow unsteady, but you'll rarely find yourself low on stamina unless you let it drop on purpose. If nothing else, though, all these new features do help give a sense that Snake really is out there all by himself, trying to survive in the harsh jungle. Quote: In Snake vs. Monkey mode, Snake is given a lengthy, convoluted mission briefing about how he's expected to, well, capture a bunch of monkeys--monkeys that bear more than a passing resemblance to those of the Ape Escape series. Catching monkeys involves sneaking up on them, blasting them unconscious either with a special pistol or with stun grenades, and then just running into them--you'll hear Snake enthusiastically shout "Gotcha!" with each successful monkey capture. There are several different, progressively tougher Snake vs. Monkey levels (each one with better-hidden monkeys than the last), and the game challenges you to beat these stages as quickly as you can. Beyond this neat extra, Metal Gear Solid 3 also invites you to download additional camouflage patterns online, though this is the extent of the game's networking features. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 18th November 2004 Quote:You can't read it yourself? ... you're at work and they've blocked Gamespot? .... I even made a damn thread about that a few weeks ago! You even posted in it, and said that you don't know anything about de-blockers!! :screwy: Quote:I'm not going by COST, I'm going by VALUE. *OB1 is teh pwneded* ... These aren't priceless, you know... And wow, I just read that gamespot review. That only further confirms Kasavin's rank among the biggest idiots in the gaming community. The gameplay hasn't changed much? Did he even play the game or just have someone else play while he closed his eyes until the cut scenes came on? There's been so much added to MGS3 in terms of gameplay and innovation that I seriously believe that he didn't play the game. There's no other explanation for it. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 18th November 2004 He talks about some things though... healing, for instance, got a big part... but as to how much the gameplay has changed, I'd obviously need to play it to know. He clearly wishes it was more like a stealth game though... but that's a style thing -- do you want a realistic game with stealth or an unrealistic one where you can just blast through? MGS takes the latter. He may be correct that it's more "out of date", but is that style more fun? For many people, yes, it probably is. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 18th November 2004 Well let's see, first up we have the camouflage system, something that has never been done before. Depending on the type of camo you wear, how easily enemies see you changes. Clothing also affects your stamina, so if you're wearing lots of camo your stamina is going to lower, but if you take off your shirt for instance, enemies will be able to see you more easily. There's also the new CQC (for close quarters combat), where you have a variety of different close-combat offensive abilities. In past Metal Gears if you were near an enemy you could do two things: choke/grab him or punch/roll into him. In Snake Eater you can interrogate the person, slit their throat (which makes conserving ammo easier to do), throw them over your shoulder onto the ground, the standard choke/hold and punch, as well as a more effective hostage/body shield system. There's also the new way of gaining health. To eat you have to find animals and kill them. To heal yourself you have to manually take bullets out of your flesh, bandage yourself, and so on. If you want to you can leave everything and have scars the the like. That's the greatest amount of change MG has seen since the first MGS. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 18th November 2004 He does mention a lot of those things, you know... The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - Private Hudson - 18th November 2004 Even with all those additions, I still think the fundamentals of the game will remain true to MGS2. That's probably what he criticizes it about. And I really don't think that he believes it to detract from the game that much. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 18th November 2004 A Black Falcon Wrote:He does mention a lot of those things, you know... Yet he still says that not much has changed. That's what we like to call a contradictory statement, Brian. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 18th November 2004 Yeah, he describes the new health system (and says how now that you can heal anytime on a pause menu and how this isn't the greatest thing), and mentions the eating of animals for food, the camo system, and inventive ways to deal with the baddies... did you really read the review, OB1? The only thing on your list there that you could even say he did not talk about is going into depth about the "new CQC system", and he discusses that some. The other three things he definitely covers in plenty of detail. As PH says, it's about the gameplay as a whole being very similar to the previous games -- how you can take very unrealistic amounts of damage and not die, how the stealth isn't really required because you are fully capable of killing them all in straight out firefights, etc... It's not contradictory. Not if you are saying that despite some relatively small things changing, the overall facts of the gameplay, and the issues that he mentions most specifically as "problems" (whether they are or not is opinion of course) are things that were in the previous games as well. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 18th November 2004 http://ps2.gamespy.com/playstation-2/metal-gear-solid-3-snake-eater/566899p1.html You'll hate Gamespy's review, OB1. They say that "Kojima wisely reigns in the high-minded metababble that tarnished MGS2." :) Well, they like MGS3 a lot (and it's a decent overview of the game with a good (4.5/5) score), but that aspect of it I'm sure you don't agree much with. :D The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - Private Hudson - 18th November 2004 Well, I read the first sentence of the Gamespot review and fell in love with the game already.... the story is convoluted! YES!! The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 18th November 2004 A Black Falcon Wrote:Yeah, he describes the new health system (and says how now that you can heal anytime on a pause menu and how this isn't the greatest thing), and mentions the eating of animals for food, the camo system, and inventive ways to deal with the baddies... did you really read the review, OB1? The only thing on your list there that you could even say he did not talk about is going into depth about the "new CQC system", and he discusses that some. The other three things he definitely covers in plenty of detail. As PH says, it's about the gameplay as a whole being very similar to the previous games -- how you can take very unrealistic amounts of damage and not die, how the stealth isn't really required because you are fully capable of killing them all in straight out firefights, etc... That's like saying that OoT is not any different from LttP because the gameplay is overall the same. There's no defending your boyfriend Kasavin this time, Brian. The man has proven time and time again that he's got the absolute worst opinion on games in the reviewing community. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 18th November 2004 A Black Falcon Wrote:Yeah, he describes the new health system (and says how now that you can heal anytime on a pause menu and how this isn't the greatest thing), and mentions the eating of animals for food, the camo system, and inventive ways to deal with the baddies... did you really read the review, OB1? The only thing on your list there that you could even say he did not talk about is going into depth about the "new CQC system", and he discusses that some. The other three things he definitely covers in plenty of detail. As PH says, it's about the gameplay as a whole being very similar to the previous games -- how you can take very unrealistic amounts of damage and not die, how the stealth isn't really required because you are fully capable of killing them all in straight out firefights, etc... That's like saying that OoT is not any different from LttP because the gameplay is overall the same. There's no defending your boyfriend Kasavin this time, Brian. The man has proven time and time again that he's got the absolute worst opinion on games in the reviewing community. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 18th November 2004 Yeah, the first paragraph of that Gamespy review does not help them improve their standing among game review sites, that's for sure... The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 18th November 2004 Yeah, the first paragraph of that Gamespy review does not help them improve their standing among game review sites, that's for sure... The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 18th November 2004 Oh great, now a new thread name? Yeah, so accurate... ![]() I don't see what's so hard to understand. He thinks that despite some added variety in ways to deal with enemies and some gameplay changes (like the healing and camo systems), the main gameplay is very similar to MGS2. Which sounds like a very reasonable assessment. Then he continues to say that he would prefer it if it was more of a stealth game. Which is opinion. But a significant part of reviewing something is opinion, so that's okay... The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 18th November 2004 Quote:That's like saying that OoT is not any different from LttP because the gameplay is overall the same. That is totally insane. MGS3 plays a lot like MGS2! All the reviews say so! Why is this such a hard idea for you to accept? Is it identical? No. Does he say it is identical? No. Quote:Snake's a one-man army, so even if he is detected, he can usually fight his way out of a bind. He's a master of "CQC," which simply stands for "close-quarters combat," a fighting style that lets him use a pistol and a knife simultaneously to capably deal with any threats. Among other things, CQC lets Snake take hostages and use them as human shields while returning fire at their cohorts. However, getting into out-and-out firefights really isn't desirable, and it's usually avoidable. For one thing, it's quite easy to take down your foes with a well-placed shot to the head from a silenced firearm (or any of the game's numerous real-world weapons, for that matter). For another thing, even if you are caught, you can often simply run right past your enemies, whose AK-47s and other weapons cause surprisingly little damage to Snake at the normal and even the hard difficulty settings. So, in contrast with the game's realistic looks, its action really isn't realistic at all, and the consequence of failing to be stealthy tends to be more of an inconvenience than a penalty. This isn't necessarily a bad thing in gameplay terms, but it dampens the sense of danger that the game tries to evoke, since it's so easy to gun down or simply evade droves of enemies. No contradictions here, clearly, if you read the paragraph... So he says near the beginning that the gameplay hasn't changed much from previous installments. But you know what? Based on the various reviews of this game, I would say that that characterization is exactly right. So once again it's just your one-man vendetta against Gamespot (like with so many other things) that is causing a 'problem' here. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 18th November 2004 Quote:That is totally insane. MGS3 plays a lot like MGS2! All the reviews say so! Why is this such a hard idea for you to accept? He says not much has changed. A lot has changed. A far great difference than OoT to WW, MGS1 to MGS2, or most sequels for that matter. LttP to OoT is a slight exagerration. Quote:No contradictions here, clearly, if you read the paragraph... Hey guess what? I have the game. You do not. And I've played all of the previous MGSs several times over. Just an hour into the game and MGS3 is drastically different from the previous ones. So sorry stupid, but your precious Kasavin has proven that he is once again a dumbass. And btw that part about stealth not being important shows that he only played the game on easy mode. There's no way you can play the game without using stealth unless you're playing on easy or very easy mode. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 18th November 2004 A Black Falcon Wrote:Oh great, now a new thread name? Yeah, so accurate... Man TC is screwing up. I can't split the threads properly. This'll have to do for now. Your usual dickhead posts are ruining my MGS3 thread, so as soon as I can I'm gonna fix everything. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 18th November 2004 More hours into the game and the more idiotic both Kasavin and you look like, Brian. Even in the first part of the game stealth is extremely important, and it's harder to get rid of enemies when you're caught than it is in Splinter Cell! I am now certain that Kasavin played the game on very easy. Absolutely. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 18th November 2004 I'd have to play it to know for sure if he's right or wrong of course... The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 19th November 2004 I've already explained how the idiot is wrong. You're as big of a moron as he is if you're still bent of siding with him. So pathetic. The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - A Black Falcon - 19th November 2004 Umm, how in the world did you interpret that last post of mine to mean what you obviously did (that is, just a restatement of my past posts in this thread)? ![]() The "Gamespot's reviews are crappy" thread - OB1 - 19th November 2004 You basically said that you're still going to believe him until you see it for yourself. Which won't happen within the next year or so, so you know that it's an easy cop-out. |