![]() |
E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - Printable Version +- Tendo City (https://www.tendocity.net) +-- Forum: Tendo City: Metropolitan District (https://www.tendocity.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Tendo City (https://www.tendocity.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=42) +--- Thread: E3: Advance Wars Under Fire (/showthread.php?tid=1889) |
E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - OB1 - 10th May 2004 WOOOT!!! ![]() ![]() Strange that it's being called Advance Wars, but I suppose that most casual gamers wouldn't be smart enough to figure out that "Cube Wars" is a part of the same series. ![]() E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - Great Rumbler - 10th May 2004 Unless this is a new GBA game? E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - OB1 - 10th May 2004 I don't think so since IGN already confirmed that Kuju was working on a GC Wars game. And IS is busy with Fire Emblem and Paper Mario 2. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - A Black Falcon - 10th May 2004 Then it should be Cube Wars! Unless it really IS for GBA, but yeah, that looks doubtful... E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - Great Rumbler - 10th May 2004 Oh well. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - OB1 - 10th May 2004 It's definitely a GC game, that much has been confirmed. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - A Black Falcon - 10th May 2004 Well then, they are stupid... E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - OB1 - 10th May 2004 Dude, we're getting a friggin' Wars game for the cube. Complain after the excitement has died down a bit. :D E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - A Black Falcon - 10th May 2004 No. :) E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - Darunia - 11th May 2004 It has potential---maybe this'll be the long-awaited follow up good GC game that I've been waiting for since I beat REMaker. :nodding: E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - OB1 - 11th May 2004 You're so weird. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - Smoke - 11th May 2004 I wonder if it will really satisfy fans of AW though. From what I've read it's an action game with "strategy elements". E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - OB1 - 11th May 2004 Yeah it's not supposed to be a TBS game like the previous ones. But you know what? I don't really care since we're getting that very same gameplay with Fire Emblem. It'll be nice to see something different for AW. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - Great Rumbler - 11th May 2004 It's supposed to an RTS. The first pics I saw look great. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - OB1 - 11th May 2004 Yeah, can't wait for it. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - A Black Falcon - 11th May 2004 True, it would be strange to release two TBSes at similar times that play pretty similarly. As long as they keep making some Wars strategy game it should be okay... E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - Great Rumbler - 11th May 2004 I don't care, I just want it. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - Great Rumbler - 11th May 2004 Images!! ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - A Black Falcon - 11th May 2004 The video is cool... you run around and shoot the other guys. :) Now, how I wish it was... the guy you're controlling would be the same as anyone else -- no stronger or anything. But when he dies you could switch to other players. Oh, and ideally it'd be something like the classic PC game Muzzle Velocity (or, to a lesser degree, Dungeon Keeper -- there too you could 'take over' the monsters, but it worked differently) -- that is, with a overhead 2d map and the ability to 'take over' any unit you choose during the battle. It looks like it'll be more like a third-person shooter with lots of guys around, but I think it'd be cooler if it was a strategy title where you could choose which guy to be and switch to other guys (auto-switch to others in the squad, then if they all die to the overhead map). I thought Muzzle Velocity was cool and I still think something else should try to do that better... and given how the older AW games work this'd be the perfect universe... E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - OB1 - 11th May 2004 I imagine you'll be able to switch between different units. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - A Black Falcon - 11th May 2004 Yeah, switching between units and having the unit you're controlling not being some super-unit (like you are in so many games) are things I'd definitely want from the game. A good switching system or more focused missions (when compared to the average AW battle) could preclude the need for some kind of overhead map for switching... though obviously I'd still want some kind of nice map. But I always want one in a game... :) E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - N_A - 12th May 2004 Well we'll see, this is an interesting rendition of the Famicom wars series. Takes it one step up and makes it super gruesome with guns blazing. From what I hear its a mix of tactical shooter in Freedom Fighter style (great 3rd party game btw, one of the few on the Cube), and real time strategy. Hopefully Kuju executes Nintendo's plans well. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - Dark Jaguar - 12th May 2004 Well it's just the wars series now, because Famicom hasn't been in the name for a long time. This is hardly an RTS, it's basically just JFG meets Pikmin, which honestly has been done before in lots of other games as of late. On the other hand, if there's an upcoming Advance Wars (meaning GBA) game that actually IS an RTS, that's different. Honestly, it would kinda have to be there, because that's about the only way to get screens the other players can't see. Remember how much Starcraft 64 sucked simply because you couldn't use a single bit of strategy that the other person couldn't see? Same thing here. If they made it for Gamecube, it would have to allow for system link at the very least. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - A Black Falcon - 12th May 2004 Um, DJ, making statements that strong based on one video? Doesn't seem smart. What N_A says is perfectly possible. Sure, the combat is action-heavy. But it certainly could have strong RTS elements -- like, along the lines I described in my post... why not? There are clearly lots of troops. You control one at a time, but how do the rest get controlled? Do you have the ability to give the other guys orders in some fashion? Can you switch around between the units and give them orders, or have AI settings, or set objectives for units and then go to the one you want to control... overview map? Who knows, we'll need to see more. But it certainly could have RTS elements and I'd be dissapointed if strategy game parts weren't in the game. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - OB1 - 12th May 2004 From N-Philes: Quote:By Vincent Goodwin ABF and NA are correct, it's an RTS of some sorts. You control more than one unit, just like IGN said a few weeks ago. BTW Derek, you might want to correct n-phile's information there as they list Intelligent Systems as the developer of this game, not Kuju. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - A Black Falcon - 12th May 2004 My first post was more a 'I liked Muzzle Velocity', but when I looked at the shots I realized that a realtime strategy game was actually likely behind that 'run around and shoot stuff' action in the movie -- the list of units on the bottom. I'm sure that has something to do with switching between them or something. So I'm happy... :) Well, it's not like Muzzle Velocity (which is basically a realtime wargame where you can take control of any unit -- and then switch to a overview map. It has some annoying things (ordering units on the overview map is a pain -- they often don't seem to go where you tell them to, for one), but I haven't played anything exactly like it...) Anyway, this looks like it's more squad-based. If you want a game with strategy that keeps the action moving, that makes sense... faster pace than setting up a system to have multiple groups. They clearly want that. So you can add groups to your squad and, I'm sure, remove them... and switch between your units whenever you want and give them orders. Sounds good. E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - OB1 - 12th May 2004 Too bad it won't be out until next year... E3: Advance Wars Under Fire - Great Rumbler - 12th May 2004 Sounds like a combination of Pikmin and Command & Conquer, which means that it sounds awesome. |