![]() |
Zelda compilation? - Printable Version +- Tendo City (https://www.tendocity.net) +-- Forum: Tendo City: Metropolitan District (https://www.tendocity.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=4) +--- Forum: Tendo City (https://www.tendocity.net/forumdisplay.php?fid=42) +--- Thread: Zelda compilation? (/showthread.php?tid=1043) |
Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 7th October 2003 Looks like Game Informer was right then! I really hope the 2D ones aren't just straight ports, but I expect them to be. It'll be nice to have a high-res version of MM, at least. And maybe they'll bring that framerate up to 60 fps. That'd be nice. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 7th October 2003 The Oracles games are one game, Zelda 7. Given how they work, I can't think of another way to classify them... Oh yeah, and I bet they will be straight ports, given that this is just a bonus disc. And what about Master Quest? Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 7th October 2003 Each Oracle game is completely unique. They link together, but they're even more different from each other than Pokemon Red is to Pokemon Sapphire. Zelda compilation? - Great Rumbler - 7th October 2003 I really want to get this. Hopefully they're be other way to get it besides buying a Gamecube. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 7th October 2003 They are two halves of the same game... that's the only way I can explain how the two games have one final boss. :) Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 7th October 2003 Each Oracle game is as long as a regular Zelda game and they are very different from each other (aside from graphics and menus). If you don't consider them full Zelda games then you can't consider MM a full Zelda game. Zelda compilation? - Dark Jaguar - 7th October 2003 You know, I'm somewhat surprised you two got into an argument on this, but I really shouldn't be :D. I'll only say that the carts themselves have numbers indicating where they lie in the series, if you care to count that. I myself found the easy way out of just using acronyms whenever I refer to a Zelda game. I don't even think about it any more. As for Zelda 1 and 2, I expect that at least Zelda 1 would have improved graphics. I expect the remade version on the Super Famicom Satellavision game to show up on this disk. Of course, we never got it so we wouldn't miss it, but being from Japan it'll be made with them in mind first, and they DID have it to miss. I sure hope the original NES version is also on there (most likely will be) though, because from what I hear the SF remake kinda sucked because they ended up shrinking down the overworld map to half it's original size and some other stuff I forget in the reviews I've read. Still, it would be nice to at least see what that remake was like for myself. I'm set on playing this and the Game & Watch Zelda game so I'll have played 'em all. Oh, I always knew it wouldn't take long for Nintendo to take a fully made game, OOT, and finally just sell the thing since it's complete already. I just didn't figure they would also package in 3 other games, what with them releasing Super Mario remakes one at a time, remakes that were once sold packaged together in one set I might add! How long do you think it will be before Nintendo announces "Super Mario Advance 5: Super Mario Bros. 1"? Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 7th October 2003 I don't think they ever will, since it already got the DX treatment. But perhaps they'll do it anyhow since they have yet to release the All-Stars version of Mario 1 on any of their handhelds. :S I really doubt that Nintendo will update the graphics of Zelda 1 for this compilation disc. They're too cheap for that. Zelda compilation? - Dark Jaguar - 7th October 2003 I didn't say they'd update them. I said they are likely to take the update they already made and put it on there. Oh, and I thought that about SMB1 too, until they rerereleased Donkey Kong Country on GBA even though it was already rereleased on GBC, just because that one looked and sounded better. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 7th October 2003 Quote:Each Oracle game is as long as a regular Zelda game and they are very different from each other (aside from graphics and menus). If you don't consider them full Zelda games then you can't consider MM a full Zelda game. 'very' different? I'd disagree. Yes, worlds, enemies, and items are different... but the gameplay is the same. More similar than any two other Zelda games. They also have a lot of characters in common, and you need to play both games to fight the real final boss! How do you reconcile that with them being completely different games? Yes, they are different... but still, they have a lot of similarities and are connected in many ways. Are they more different than any two Pokemon games? Probably... but that's saying next to nothing... :) Zelda compilation? - Laser Link - 7th October 2003 I wanted to use numbers because it reminded me of the good old days before OoT or MM had names, and we just called them Zelda 64 or (in the case of ZHQ, Zelda 5) or Zelda 6, Zelda Gaiden, or Zelda 64 2 (that was always a funny on, like Metroid Prime 2). Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 7th October 2003 Quote:I didn't say they'd update them. I said they are likely to take the update they already made and put it on there. I thought that satellite Zelda update wasn't the full game... Quote:'very' different? I'd disagree. Yes, worlds, enemies, and items are different... but the gameplay is the same. More similar than any two other Zelda games. They also have a lot of characters in common, and you need to play both games to fight the real final boss! How do you reconcile that with them being completely different games? Now this is rich. ABF-- the guy who thinks that the wall jump in Mega Man X made it a radically different game from the previous MM games-- doesn't think that the two Oracle games can be considered seperate titles. ![]() Oracle of Seasons and Oracle of Ages may control and look like each other, but all of the 2D Zeldas play similarily to each other (aside from Zelda 2, of course) and are more different from each other than even Mega Man 1 and Mega Man x6. Sure there's a huge graphical leap between those two MM's, but everything else is identical. Zelda compilation? - Dark Jaguar - 7th October 2003 I only read a few FAQs for that game, all made for an incomplete version. They apparently did complete it just before shutting down the system, but apparently the guides were all made for some copy of the incomplete version floating around the net which apparently is all they can find. Oh well... In any case, even if it wasn't 100% completed, from what I understand it was like 95% or so complete so adding the last level or whatever was missing shouldn't be that hard a task. Besides, that's just the 3rd quest. The first two didn't need to be downloaded and were already complete. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 7th October 2003 The gameplay? Yes, its more different than any two MM or any two MMX (not MM and MMX, I'd say, though) games... like the MM games they play very, very similarly, and share a graphics engine with the also very similar Link's Awakening... But no MM games have you play through multiple games before you can fight the real final boss. No MM games have connectivity between the games where you can transfer items, etc. But yes... by most standards they are different games, and not just alternate versions like Pokemon Red/Blue. Silver/Gold, Ruby/Sapphire, etc, or Megaman Battle Network Blue/White or Bomberman Max Red/Blue or other things like that. But I still I think the best classification, as I said before, it calling the pair together Zelda 7... 7A and 7B? :) I know... they are more different than some random MM games... but still... there is one final boss! Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 8th October 2003 That doesn't matter! It's just an added bonus to the games! There are many games where you can trade or bring over items to other games, like the Suikoden games for the PSX. They're most certainly full, individual games, but have some cool save transfer features. You can still play each Oracle game by itself and it'll be just as long as unique as any other entry to the series. They're just as much full Zelda games as Majora's Mask is. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 8th October 2003 Majora's Mask is probably more different from OoT than Oracles is from LA, though... Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 8th October 2003 Maybe by a bit because of the three-day system, but it's also shorter. Each Oracle game is longer than MM. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 8th October 2003 Not once you factor in MM's irritation factor, no way... the Oracles games have one of the Zelda serieses best save systems. Only LA and WW are also that generous... But in number of times you die? Yeah, they are harder than MM. They just aren't nearly as frusterating. And I'd hardly call the conclusion of the games 'a small bonus'... Maybe I was wrong to say that they are the same game, but I do think that they don't deserve to have two seperate numbers in the series. Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 8th October 2003 Then neither does MM. You'll have to call that Zelda 5.5 if you don't want to call the Oracle games Zeldas 7 & 8. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 8th October 2003 Why? MM is less like its predecessor and isn't tied with another one story-wise... Now, if they had come out like a year apart I'd probably call them different games, the second being a sequel. But they came out at the same time... that definitely factors into it. Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 8th October 2003 That's the dumbest thing I've heard from you in a while. So I guess that means that Metroid Fusion and Metroid Prime aren't seperate games because they came out on the same day. ![]() MM looks and controls just like OoT, and it has the exact same menus. It's just as different from OoT as the two Oracle games are to each other. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 8th October 2003 No... MM has improved graphics from OoT, more enemies, the day system, etc... OoA/S and LA don't have that much (if anything) differentiating them graphically. Fine, call it whatever you want, but I'll call the Oracles series collectively Zelda 7... since each Zelda game is a story, and the two Oracles games interlock to form the complete story of the games... MM doesn't do that with OoT, it just continues on the end. Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 9th October 2003 You're absolutely nuts, ABF. You've proven this time and time again but you never cease to amaze me. MM uses the exact same engine as OoT, with just some slightly better textures and a wee bit of slowdown. Most of the enemies are the same, the controls are 100% identical, and the entire interface/HUD is 98% identical to OoT's. Every Zelda game has new enemies (even the Oracles), and the difference in graphics quality between OoT and MM is actually very comparable to Seasons and Ages (with Ages having a better, larger color palette). And the three day thing? Seasons has a four seasons system and Ages has a Back to the Future thing going for it. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 9th October 2003 Yes, yes, yes there are plenty of differences between the two games... but mostly for story purposes I just think that they make sense together. You cannot deny that none of the other Zelda games have interlocking stories like those two! Yes, they are different... but the two together form one story that only makes sense with both parts. Sort of like the two expansions for Disciples II... Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 9th October 2003 Who cares about story in a Zelda game??! Take away the link feature and you still have two long, unique Zelda games that are just as different from each other as MM and OoT are! Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 9th October 2003 I really do think that Ages and Seasons are more similar than OoT and MM, gameplay wise too... they both have different versions of the world and travel between them (major features in both games), they both have a very similar progression, lots of the same items, some of the same characters, the worlds look relatively similar, they both have the collectable rings, passwords which get you stuff in the other game, etc... they are the two most similar Zelda games. And answer this. Which is '7' and which is '8'? :D Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 9th October 2003 All of the Zelda games have similar progression. All of the 2D Zeldas aside from Zelda 2 have very similar-looking maps. All of the 3D Zeldas have similar-looking maps (yes, even WW with its water--take the water away and you have a regular-sized Hyrule). MM has the three-day system which allows for some pretty unique gameplay possibilities, but so do the Oracle games. The regular, "main" Zelda titles are pretty much identical to each other in terms of gameplay and progression. Zelda 1, LttP, LA, OoT, and WW are the standard Zeldas. Then there is Zelda 2, MM, and the Oracles which took the traditional Zelda formula and added their own twists to it which made for a different "gaiden" set of games. The seasons changing aspect of OoS, the time-traveling aspect of OoA (which, while time-travel is nothing new to the series, was done very differently in OoA), the three-day "Groundhog Day" system of MM, and the side-scrolling aspect of Link's Adventure. Aside from Zelda 2 all of those gaiden games looked and controlled just like the regular games. And as for which one is 7 and which one is 8, I think ZHQ's order is the best one: The Legend of Zelda (1) The Legend of Zelda: Link's Adventure (2) The Legend of Zelda: A Link to the Past (3) The Legend of Zelda: Link's Awaikening (4) The Legend of Zelda: Ocarina of Time (5) The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (6) The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Ages (7) The Legend of Zelda: Oracle of Seasons (8) The Legend of Zelda: Wind Waker (9) And then chronological order would be: Link I: Ocarina of Time Majora's Mask Link II: The Wind Waker Link III: A Link to the Past Oracle of Ages/Seasons Link's Awakening Link IV: Legend of Zelda The Adventure of Link Zelda compilation? - Dark Jaguar - 9th October 2003 I don't think Link 3 had anything to do with the Oracle games. I think the Oracle games should be considered an alternate reality story. The only thing I'll say about chronology for numbering is if you look at the weird code on every Nintendo cartridge, you'll usually see something that's short for the game's name. For instance, Final Fantasy 3 for SNES has the characters "F6", meaning Final Fantasy 6. Super Mario All-Stars has the characters "M4", meaning 4 Mario games. In any case, Seasons and Ages have the codes "Z7" and "Z8" on them, respectively. So, if you decided to go with numbers, and counted the Oracle games as seperate, I guess you'd have to put Seasons first, then Oracles. That is, if you care at all about the little code there... Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 9th October 2003 Hmm, that's interesting. Call Seasons Zelda 7 then, I guess. The Oracle games fit perfectly into the Link III timeline, and that makes much more sense than just putting them into an alternate reality. Of course there's no decent, official Zelda timeline, but ZHQ's makes the most sense. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 9th October 2003 ZHQ lists Ages before Seasons? I don't see how anyone could list one before the other... they don't have an order... they go together and can go in either order. That's a clue that they are a bit different than game and sequel like OoT and MM (for classification purposes)... :) Oh yeah, and LA, Ages, and Seasons... they don't specifically go in one spot. Yes, LA makes the most sense after LttP, but I've seen a semi-plausible case for putting it in several other places in the chronology... and as for Ages/Seasons, they could go absolutely anywhere. They have no specified place in the series... there is no backstory that nails it down to a specific Link, I think... or not much, anyway... The rest of that chronology is of course correct. Oh, DJ, I don't know if I'd use that code for getting the game name... :) Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 9th October 2003 The Oracle games feature the same Link sprite as LA's, so you know... Zelda compilation? - Dark Jaguar - 9th October 2003 I'm not sure they DO fit perfectly in there though. I've read their chronology, and even commented on it with my own changes to it. It's either here or in the fallout shelter. It was a very long post... Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 9th October 2003 Well find that post then. Zelda compilation? - Dark Jaguar - 9th October 2003 Eh, I'll get around to it... eventually... Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 9th October 2003 Except we all know you won't... Oh yeah, and while that is the same Link sprite as in LA, that doesn't mean much. LA's Link is supposedly LttP's, if you believe the chronology, yet he looks nothing like LttP's Link... And as I said! LA doesn't have a hard location either, so if you say they belong with LA you aren't saying that they belong after LttP. They just start in Hyrule... which rules out Link 2, but it really could be after AoL, MM, or LttP, I think... Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 10th October 2003 That didn't make any sense. Repeat that for me, will ya? Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 10th October 2003 the OoA/S Link sprites are the LA Link sprite. Correct, and expected since they share a game engine. However, that does not prove that they are the same Link. Note that the normal way to interpret LA is that its a sequel to LttP -- and that game's Link looks almost nothing like LA's Link! My other point is that LA doesn't specify a place either and actually could be in several places in the chronology. LttP is just the most sensible one. Zelda compilation? - OB1 - 10th October 2003 Well you can't really be sure of anything when it comes to Zelda, but ZHQ's timeline makes the most sense. I just wish Nintendo would release a good official one. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 10th October 2003 Yeah, that would help a lot. But they just don't care... Zelda compilation? - Great Rumbler - 10th October 2003 I don't think even Shiggy could wade through the quagmire that is the Legend of Zelda storyline. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 10th October 2003 Yeah, he'd have problems, given that it is badly lacking in facts and has so many quasi-contradictory 'facts' in it... they could muck through it but it'd require making up stuff. Zelda compilation? - Great Rumbler - 10th October 2003 That the whole point. He doesn't do it because it would take a lot of work and I'm sure he'd rather spend that time making GAMES. Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 10th October 2003 But they should have thought of it when making the games... Zelda compilation? - Great Rumbler - 11th October 2003 And while they're doing that they should also make a coherent storyline for Mario! I'm sure I speak for everyone when I say it has been a long time coming! Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 11th October 2003 Heh, now THAT would be quite the task... :D Zelda compilation? - Great Rumbler - 11th October 2003 You see, actually he went on vacation in Sunshine between Mario 1 and Mario 2. This is true because in a side-note in the manual for Mario 3 mentions that... Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 11th October 2003 Oh, of couse... ![]() Zelda compilation? - Dark Jaguar - 11th October 2003 Except I actually CARE about the Zelda story, which is serious, as opposed to the Mario story, which is fun to the point where glaring plotholes announce their existance with flare and a Kart race, and you love the whole franchise for it! Part of the fun of Zelda is being sucked into a fantasy adventure. Kinda hard for the immersion to be complete if the story sucks. Besides, the Zelda storyline seems to actually WORK by some miracle. However, they didn't just connect all the dots for us. Plus, to explain some of the small errors you have to accept things like stories getting slightly skewed in the details over time and retellings. UPDATE! I finally updated this thing below. Read it for the new paragraphs. I also removed a couple WHOLE PARAGRAPHS containing some pre-WW stuff. The new stuff makes MUCH more sense. Quote:In any case, first off, the idea of placing most of the Zelda 2 backstory long before OOT is something I think I'll buy. It does make a lot of sense. The backstory never did say for certain that the scroll and 6 jewels had to be put there by the same king as the one long long ago who had the first Zelda as a daughter, those could have (and according to this guy, was) placed there AFTER LTTP. Ya know, I think I'll write a thesis on this :D. I could end up getting hired to write some Perfect Works storyline guide for the series, well, unless it turns out I suck... :D Edit: Well, I noticed too the font was too small. I removed the smallfont tag. Now it looks like this. Kinda ugly, but you can read it... I suppose something in between should be picked eventually... Suggest a font size, win a prize! Zelda compilation? - A Black Falcon - 11th October 2003 ACK! Huge! Restore the much better small font! Zelda compilation? - Dark Jaguar - 11th October 2003 Consider it done my lord! I guess that shows people shouldn't complain about it huh? |